Gemm reduce max#209
Merged
Merged
Conversation
rosenrodt
reviewed
Apr 28, 2022
93a01e8 to
ca77a79
Compare
rosenrodt
reviewed
Apr 29, 2022
asroy
reviewed
Apr 30, 2022
asroy
reviewed
Apr 30, 2022
asroy
reviewed
Apr 30, 2022
rosenrodt
reviewed
May 3, 2022
220985c to
e046063
Compare
c917544 to
b348bf5
Compare
asroy
reviewed
May 13, 2022
[Why] Prepare to add out elementop
3bde7f7 to
ec22933
Compare
asroy
approved these changes
May 20, 2022
Contributor
asroy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. Thanks for the effort
illsilin
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2024
Update develop branch from public repository
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I use hip library version of atomicMax instead of buffer addressing.