Skip to content

Conversation

@agozillon
Copy link

No description provided.

This PR introduces a new additional type of map lowering for record types that Clang currently supports, in which a user can map a top-level record type and then individual members with different mapping, effectively creating a sort of "overlapping" mapping that we attempt to cut around.

This is currently most predominantly used in Fortran, when mapping descriptors and there data, we map the descriptor and its data with separate map modifiers and "cut around" the pointer data, so that wedo not overwrite it unless the runtime deems it a neccesary action based on its reference counting mechanism. However, it is a mechanism that will come in handy/trigger when a user explitily maps a record type (derived type or structure) and then explicitly maps a member with a different map type.

These additions were predominantly in the OpenMPToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp file and phase, however, one Flang test that checks end-to-end IR compilation (as far as we care for now at least) was altered.

2/3 required PRs to enable declare target to mapping, should look at PR 3/3 to check for full green passes (this one will fail a number due to some dependencies).

Co-authored-by: Raghu Maddhipatla raghu.maddhipatla@amd.com
…ntation

While the infrastructure for declare target to/enter and link for variables exists in the MLIR dialect and at the Flang level, the current lowering from MLIR -> LLVM IR isn't in place, it's only in place for variables that have the link clause applied.

This PR aims to extend that lowering to an initial implementation that incorporates declare target to as well, which primarily requires changes in the OpenMPToLLVMIRTranslation phase. However, a minor addition to the OpenMP dialect was required to extend the declare target enumerator to include a default None field as well.

This also requires a minor change to the Flang lowering's MapInfoFinlization.cpp pass to alter the map type for descriptors to deal with cases where a variable is marked declare to. Currently, when a descriptor variable is mapped declare target to the descriptor component can become attatched, and cannot be updated, this results in issues when an unusual allocation range is specified (effectively an off-by X error). The current solution is to map the descriptor always, as we always require an up-to-date version of this data. However, this also requires an interlinked PR that adds a more intricate type of mapping of structures/record types that clang currently implements, to circumvent the overwriting of the pointer in the descriptor.

3/3 required PRs to enable declare target to mapping, this PR should pass all tests and provide an all green CI.

Co-authored-by: Raghu Maddhipatla raghu.maddhipatla@amd.com
@agozillon agozillon requested a review from ronlieb November 24, 2025 19:05
@github-actions
Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@z1-cciauto
Copy link
Collaborator

@ronlieb ronlieb merged commit 5d7c0e4 into amd-staging Nov 24, 2025
6 checks passed
@ronlieb ronlieb deleted the amd/dev/agozillo/init-decl-tar-to-1-guideline-merge branch November 24, 2025 22:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants