You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, thanks for creating Rackula. I really like its focus on rack planning and the clean, visual interface.
While using it, I started thinking about a possible evolution of the project. Today Rackula is excellent for planning racks, but I think it could also become a great tool for ongoing rack and infrastructure documentation. After all, once you've planned a rack in Rackula, why not just keep it and continue using it as the source of truth instead of having to recreate the documentation elsewhere?
This wouldn't necessarily require turning Rackula into a full DCIM/IPAM platform like NetBox. Instead, it could remain lightweight and focused on the physical layer—racks, devices, and their connections.
I think there is a gap between simple rack planners and comprehensive infrastructure management tools, and Rackula could fill that space very well.
Would this be something you'd be interested in exploring? If so, I'd be happy to discuss ideas or even contribute.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
First of all, thanks for creating Rackula. I really like its focus on rack planning and the clean, visual interface.
While using it, I started thinking about a possible evolution of the project. Today Rackula is excellent for planning racks, but I think it could also become a great tool for ongoing rack and infrastructure documentation. After all, once you've planned a rack in Rackula, why not just keep it and continue using it as the source of truth instead of having to recreate the documentation elsewhere?
For example, it could support documenting:
This wouldn't necessarily require turning Rackula into a full DCIM/IPAM platform like NetBox. Instead, it could remain lightweight and focused on the physical layer—racks, devices, and their connections.
I think there is a gap between simple rack planners and comprehensive infrastructure management tools, and Rackula could fill that space very well.
Would this be something you'd be interested in exploring? If so, I'd be happy to discuss ideas or even contribute.
All reactions