chore: bump version to v0.4.0

[RadCod3]

$subject

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

• 🔍 Trigger a full review

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the project version number in pyproject.toml from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0. This is a single-line configuration change with no modifications to code logic or behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Version Configuration pyproject.toml	Updated version field from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0 in the [project] section.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Bump version to 0.2.0 #37: Updates the version field in pyproject.toml with the same type of configuration change.
• Bump version to 0.3.0 #60: Performs a version bump in pyproject.toml (0.2.0→0.3.0), following the same pattern as this PR.

Poem

🐰 The version climbs up high and spry,
From point-three to point-four in the sky,
A tiny bump, but oh so neat,
Makes the release cycle complete! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description is empty or contains only a placeholder variable, providing no meaningful information about the changeset.	Provide a meaningful description explaining the purpose and context of the version bump, even if brief.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'chore: bump version to v0.4.0' directly and clearly describes the main change: updating the project version.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch release/v0.4.0

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.56%. Comparing base (dfdc711) to head (3c9340a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #71   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.56%   97.56%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        3118     3118           
=======================================
  Hits         3042     3042           
  Misses         76       76           

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	97.56% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.