Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
disables all automatic decoy generation. But probably the better way for you is to have your decoys in a separate FASTA file and tick the decoy checkbox on the decoy FASTA. This way xiSEARCH is aware that you made your own decoys and also does not autogenerate any. One advantage over just adding AUTODECOY:false is that xiSEARCH still flags decoy matches as such. Also you have several options for randomized FASTA instead of reversed. will mix up the sequence of each protein. Options you have: Mix up the sequence of each protein with only the aminoacids of that protein Completely randomly generate proteins of the same length: Randomly generate the decoy proteins but the possible aminoacids are taken for each target protein and the pair wise propability of amino acids following each other is taken into account However by default the decoy generation is digestion aware. And for all but the reversed methods this means that the digestible amino acids stay in place - meaning All Ks and Rs stay where they are, which is probably still ok as it would be unlikely to still have the LL in place. You can switch that of with |
|
If you want to use one or more of these option regularly you could add them to the BasicConfigEntries.conf file in the xiSEARCH folder. you could add things like: If you like to have comments in your config describing what it does you can add this there as well: Would add: to the config. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
XiSearch analytical problem:
I am doing a small crosslinking for structure experiment and there is a palindromic sequence of KKLLKK which is involved in both DSSO and EDC type crosslinks. The default reverse decoy results in a somewhat concerning number of topmatches being the REVerse decoy of this sequence ie KKLLK, KLLK or LLKK- which are obviously exactly the same the same as forward in terms of sequence.
Does xiSearch deal with these edge cases in some way?
Unclear instructions or a Bug
When i provide a shuffled fasta instead, appending REV_ in front of the protein name, it ignores it and instead generates a a new REV_ and even a REV_REV_ anyway!
Attempted Mitigations:
Tested in both 1.8.7 and 1.8.11.
Submitted both as single FASTA and as two separate fastas Indicating the decoy on the shuffled FASTA.
Question
What is the appropriate way to deal with these kinds of sequences?
Thanks
ADDIT
After furhter searching through source code there is a custom Settings to addres this:
AUTODECOY:false
DECOY_GENERATION:shuffle
All reactions