Process improvements are not chased to completion

[rptb1]

We do not have a complete process to ensure that process improvements resulting from review (or elsewhere) are completed and deployed. We're relying too much on memory and individual diligence.

We should ensure they don't get lost with written procedure.

Raised from

mps/procedure/review.rst

Lines 1120 to 1123 in 654c24c

	_`.pi.exit`: After action has been taken and recorded on every
	suggestion, tell `.role.leader`_. [This procedure doesn't make it
	clear how the leader tracks and receives this information, when it
	times out, etc. RB 2023-02-01.]

[thejayps]

Process improvements are taking place (hence not critical to fix). We just arent' systematically tracking down and actioning everything previously identified

[thejayps]

Comment from @rptb1: If someone want's to fork the project, they won't necessarily have a culture around process improvement, they will need a hook to do it.