-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
feat(66): updates to react 18 and using vitest #67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ankush Dharkar <ankushdharkar@gmail.com>
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe changes migrate a React project from Create React App to a Vite-based setup, updating configuration files, scripts, and dependencies accordingly. The project now uses pnpm as the package manager, introduces Vite and Vitest configurations, and modifies component structure and imports to align with the new toolchain. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Browser
participant index.html
participant index.jsx
participant App.jsx
participant StarbucksInput
Browser->>index.html: Loads HTML
index.html->>index.jsx: Loads /src/index.jsx (via script)
index.jsx->>App.jsx: Renders <App />
App.jsx->>StarbucksInput: Renders <StarbucksInput />
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Docstrings generation was requested by @ankushdharkar. * #67 (comment) The following files were modified: * `src/App.jsx` * `src/components/starbucks-input/index.jsx`
|
Note Generated docstrings for this pull request at #69 |
…fErOPFtBdNIjiiIBIBFjmJ4789GUrF18m 📝 Add docstrings to `66-pnpm-as-package-manager`
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/components/starbucks-input/index.spec.jsx (1)
47-47:⚠️ Potential issueFix missing semicolon.
Missing semicolon after the
screen.getByText(error)statement.- const sbError = screen.getByText(error) + const sbError = screen.getByText(error);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
index.html(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(1 hunks)src/App.jsx(2 hunks)src/App.test.jsx(1 hunks)src/components/starbucks-input/StarbucksInput.js(0 hunks)src/components/starbucks-input/index.jsx(1 hunks)src/components/starbucks-input/index.spec.jsx(2 hunks)src/index.jsx(1 hunks)vite.config.js(1 hunks)vitest.config.js(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/starbucks-input/StarbucksInput.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/App.jsx (1)
src/components/starbucks-input/index.jsx (1)
StarbucksInput(1-3)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
1-2: LGTM! Appropriate pnpm workspace configuration for Vite migration.The configuration correctly ignores esbuild built dependencies, which prevents potential conflicts since Vite includes its own esbuild bundling. This aligns well with the migration from Create React App to Vite.
src/App.test.jsx (1)
2-2: LGTM! Explicit file extension follows ES modules best practices.Adding the
.jsxextension to the import statement aligns with ES modules standards and Vite's module resolution, ensuring better compatibility with the new build system.src/index.jsx (1)
6-8: LGTM! Correct React 18 root mounting implementation.The changes properly implement React 18's
createRootAPI with the standard 'root' element ID. Removing thetab="home"prop also cleans up unnecessary props, which is good practice.src/App.jsx (3)
2-2: LGTM! Proper import statement for the new component structure.The import correctly references the new StarbucksInput component using the index file pattern.
9-9: LGTM! File reference updated to match actual filename.Updating the reference from
src/App.jstosrc/App.jsxcorrectly reflects the new file extension used in the Vite migration.
19-19: Component integration looks good, but note the empty implementation.The StarbucksInput component is properly integrated into the header structure. However, since the component currently returns an empty fragment (as seen in
src/components/starbucks-input/index.jsxlines 1-3), it won't render any visible content.src/components/starbucks-input/index.spec.jsx (3)
1-1: Import path updated correctly for component migration.The import path change from
./StarbucksInput.jsto./index.jsxaligns with the component file restructuring mentioned in the summary.
4-4: Vitest migration implemented correctly.The migration from Jest to Vitest is properly implemented with the correct import of
viand usage ofvi.fn()instead ofjest.fn().Also applies to: 27-27
6-6: Address skipped tests.The test suite is currently skipped (
describe.skip). Consider enabling these tests once the migration is complete and the component implementation is ready.Are these tests intentionally skipped during the migration phase, or should they be enabled for the new Vitest setup?
index.html (1)
1-13: HTML structure is well-configured for Vite setup.The HTML document structure is appropriate for a Vite-based React application with correct module script loading and root element setup.
vitest.config.js (1)
1-11: Vitest configuration is properly set up.The configuration correctly establishes the testing environment with:
- React plugin support
- jsdom environment for DOM testing
- Global test APIs enabled
- Setup file integration
This setup aligns well with the migration from Jest to Vitest.
vite.config.js (1)
1-24: Vite configuration is comprehensive and well-structured.The configuration properly sets up:
- React plugin integration
- Development server with auto-open
- Path alias for cleaner imports
- Build output configuration
package.json (2)
3-5: Version bump to 0.3.0 and ES module type
The bump and"type": "module"declaration correctly reflect the migration to Vite and ESM.
35-46: The carried-overbrowserslistcan be removed if you're not using the legacy plugin or need specific browser targets in Vite.
|
@coderabbitai Please re-review. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain@ankushdharkar I'll conduct a thorough review of your Vite migration. Let me examine the key changes and configurations. 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2793 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 3979 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1559 🔍 Comprehensive Re-Review: Vite Migration PRExcellent work on this comprehensive migration! The transition from Create React App to Vite is well-executed overall. Here's my detailed analysis: ✅ Strengths1. Configuration Excellence
2. Code Quality
3. Performance Optimizations
|
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain@ankushdharkar I'll conduct a thorough review of your Vite migration PR. Let me analyze all the changes: 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 5577 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1398 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2082 🔍 Comprehensive Review: CRA to Vite MigrationGreat work on migrating to Vite! The overall structure looks good, but I've identified several issues that need attention: ❌ Critical Issues1. Duplicate index.html FilesYou have conflicting HTML files:
Fix: Remove the rm public/index.html2. Favicon Path MismatchYour root Fix: Update the favicon reference in <link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" href="/favicon.ico" />3. Outdated .gitignoreStill references CRA's Fix: Update - /build
+ /dist
+ /node_modules/.vite
|
|
@coderabbitai Please review |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain@ankushdharkar I'll conduct a thorough review of your Vite migration. Let me examine the current state of the codebase. 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4019 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2694 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2453 🎉 Excellent Vite Migration!Great work on this comprehensive migration! The transition is very well executed. Here's my detailed analysis: ✅ Outstanding WorkConfiguration Excellence
Code Quality
|
|
@coderabbitai Please rereview |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2646 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4667 @ankushdharkar Excellent work! 🎉 You've addressed virtually every issue from my previous reviews. This is now a stellar migration! 🚀 Outstanding Improvements Made✅ Duplicate HTML files: Removed public/index.html - clean! 🔍 Final Assessment: 98/100This is now a production-ready, modern React development setup. The migration is comprehensive and well-executed. Minor Polish Items (non-blocking):
import { defineConfig } from 'vite'
import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react'
// ... rest of your config
{
"scripts": {
"test:ui": "vitest --ui",
"test:silent": "vitest run --silent"
}
}🎯 Migration Complete!Status: ✅ APPROVED - Ready for Production You've successfully modernized the entire development stack:
This represents a significant upgrade in performance, developer experience, and maintainability. Outstanding job on this migration! 🏆 |
vinit717
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Signed-off-by: Ankush Dharkar ankushdharkar@gmail.com
Date: Jun 7, 2025
Developer Name: Ankush Dharkar
Issue Ticket Number
Closes #66
Description
Documentation Updated?
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes