refactor: remove AssigneeTaskDetailsDTO and related repository, updat… #192
Conversation
…e task assignment handling - Deleted AssigneeTaskDetailsDTO and its associated model and repository to streamline task assignment logic. - Updated references in TaskDTO, CreateTaskAssignmentResponse, and various services to use TaskAssignmentDTO instead. - Adjusted validation and handling in TaskAssignmentService and TaskRepository to reflect the new structure. - Cleaned up tests to align with the updated task assignment implementation.
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis change removes all legacy Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AssignTaskToUserView
participant TaskAssignmentService
participant TaskAssignmentRepository
participant TaskAssignmentModel
Client->>AssignTaskToUserView: PATCH /tasks/{task_id}/assign
AssignTaskToUserView->>TaskAssignmentService: create_task_assignment(dto, user_id)
TaskAssignmentService->>TaskAssignmentRepository: get_by_task_id(task_id)
TaskAssignmentRepository-->>TaskAssignmentService: return TaskAssignmentModel or None
alt No existing assignment
TaskAssignmentService->>TaskAssignmentRepository: create(TaskAssignmentModel)
TaskAssignmentRepository-->>TaskAssignmentService: return TaskAssignmentModel
else Existing assignment
TaskAssignmentService->>TaskAssignmentRepository: update_assignment(...)
TaskAssignmentRepository-->>TaskAssignmentService: return updated TaskAssignmentModel
end
TaskAssignmentService-->>AssignTaskToUserView: CreateTaskAssignmentResponse(TaskAssignmentDTO)
AssignTaskToUserView-->>Client: Response
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
todo/tests/integration/test_task_defer_api.py (1)
41-41: Fix field name inconsistency.The test data still uses
relation_typebut should useuser_typeto match the new TaskAssignment model schema.Apply this diff to fix the field name:
- "relation_type": "user", + "user_type": "user",todo/repositories/task_repository.py (1)
26-33: Fix inconsistent repository usage.There's an inconsistency in the file where lines 26-33 still use the legacy
AssigneeTaskDetailsRepositorywhile other parts of the file have been updated to useTaskAssignmentRepository. This will cause runtime errors if the legacy repository is removed.Apply this diff to fix the inconsistency:
- if team_id: - from todo.repositories.assignee_task_details_repository import AssigneeTaskDetailsRepository - - logger.debug(f"TaskRepository.list: team_id={team_id}") - team_assignments = AssigneeTaskDetailsRepository.get_by_assignee_id(team_id, "team") - team_task_ids = [assignment.task_id for assignment in team_assignments] - logger.debug(f"TaskRepository.list: team_task_ids={team_task_ids}") - query_filter = {"_id": {"$in": team_task_ids}} + if team_id: + logger.debug(f"TaskRepository.list: team_id={team_id}") + team_assignments = TaskAssignmentRepository.get_by_assignee_id(team_id, "team") + team_task_ids = [assignment.task_id for assignment in team_assignments] + logger.debug(f"TaskRepository.list: team_task_ids={team_task_ids}") + query_filter = {"_id": {"$in": team_task_ids}}Similarly, update the count method:
- if team_id: - from todo.repositories.assignee_task_details_repository import AssigneeTaskDetailsRepository - - team_assignments = AssigneeTaskDetailsRepository.get_by_assignee_id(team_id, "team") - team_task_ids = [assignment.task_id for assignment in team_assignments] - query_filter = {"_id": {"$in": team_task_ids}} + if team_id: + team_assignments = TaskAssignmentRepository.get_by_assignee_id(team_id, "team") + team_task_ids = [assignment.task_id for assignment in team_assignments] + query_filter = {"_id": {"$in": team_task_ids}}todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py (1)
341-341: Update test payload to use the new field name.The test payload should use
user_typeinstead ofrelation_typeto match the new DTO structure.- "assignee": {"assignee_id": self.user_id, "relation_type": "user"}, + "assignee": {"assignee_id": self.user_id, "user_type": "user"},todo/services/task_service.py (1)
294-294: Fix field name from relation_type to user_type.Multiple places in the code still use
relation_typeinstead ofuser_type, which will cause runtime errors with the new TaskAssignment model.Update line 294:
- relation_type = assignee_info.get("relation_type") + user_type = assignee_info.get("user_type")Update line 296:
- if relation_type == "user": + if user_type == "user":Update line 300:
- elif relation_type == "team": + elif user_type == "team":Update line 324:
- assignee_info["relation_type"], + assignee_info["user_type"],Update line 399:
- relation_type = dto.assignee.get("relation_type") + user_type = dto.assignee.get("user_type")Update line 401:
- if relation_type == "user": + if user_type == "user":Update line 405:
- elif relation_type == "team": + elif user_type == "team":Update line 435:
- user_type=dto.assignee["relation_type"], + user_type=dto.assignee["user_type"],Also applies to: 324-324, 399-399, 435-435
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
todo/dto/assignee_task_details_dto.py(0 hunks)todo/dto/responses/create_task_assignment_response.py(1 hunks)todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py(1 hunks)todo/dto/task_dto.py(2 hunks)todo/models/assignee_task_details.py(0 hunks)todo/repositories/assignee_task_details_repository.py(0 hunks)todo/repositories/task_assignment_repository.py(1 hunks)todo/repositories/task_repository.py(4 hunks)todo/services/task_assignment_service.py(3 hunks)todo/services/task_service.py(5 hunks)todo/services/user_service.py(2 hunks)todo/tests/fixtures/task.py(3 hunks)todo/tests/integration/test_task_defer_api.py(2 hunks)todo/tests/integration/test_task_detail_api.py(3 hunks)todo/tests/integration/test_task_profile_api.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/integration/test_task_sorting_integration.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/integration/test_task_update_api.py(2 hunks)todo/tests/integration/test_tasks_delete.py(2 hunks)todo/tests/unit/models/test_task.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_task_repository.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py(3 hunks)todo/tests/unit/views/test_task_assignment.py(4 hunks)todo/views/task.py(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- todo/models/assignee_task_details.py
- todo/dto/assignee_task_details_dto.py
- todo/repositories/assignee_task_details_repository.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (7)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#119
File: todo/repositories/task_repository.py:149-154
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T19:59:31.694Z
Learning: In the todo-backend project, per product requirements, tasks marked as deleted (isDeleted=True) should still be returned in user task queries. The get_tasks_for_user method in TaskRepository should not filter out deleted tasks, unlike typical soft deletion patterns.
todo/services/user_service.py (2)
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:98-112
Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z
Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#119
File: todo/repositories/task_repository.py:149-154
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T19:59:31.694Z
Learning: In the todo-backend project, per product requirements, tasks marked as deleted (isDeleted=True) should still be returned in user task queries. The get_tasks_for_user method in TaskRepository should not filter out deleted tasks, unlike typical soft deletion patterns.
todo/tests/integration/test_task_profile_api.py (6)
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#119
File: todo/repositories/task_repository.py:149-154
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T19:59:31.694Z
Learning: In the todo-backend project, per product requirements, tasks marked as deleted (isDeleted=True) should still be returned in user task queries. The get_tasks_for_user method in TaskRepository should not filter out deleted tasks, unlike typical soft deletion patterns.
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#75
File: todo/tests/integration/test_tasks_delete.py:20-23
Timestamp: 2025-06-08T15:58:01.548Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository, integration tests focus on API behavior (HTTP status codes, response structure) while unit tests handle verification of actual database operations and state changes. Database verification should not be added to integration tests.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 tracks the implementation of user authentication in the todo-backend project, which includes extracting user ID from request context to replace hardcoded placeholders like "system_patch_user" in todo/views/task.py.
Learnt from: shobhan-sundar-goutam
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#95
File: todo/services/label_service.py:86-91
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:44:05.550Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend project, the GET v1/labels endpoint is designed to return only three fields in the response: id, name, and color. The prepare_label_dto method in todo/services/label_service.py intentionally excludes other LabelDTO fields like createdAt, updatedAt, createdBy, and updatedBy from the API response.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:98-112
Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z
Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.
todo/tests/fixtures/task.py (4)
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:98-112
Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z
Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#119
File: todo/repositories/task_repository.py:149-154
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T19:59:31.694Z
Learning: In the todo-backend project, per product requirements, tasks marked as deleted (isDeleted=True) should still be returned in user task queries. The get_tasks_for_user method in TaskRepository should not filter out deleted tasks, unlike typical soft deletion patterns.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
Learnt from: shobhan-sundar-goutam
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#95
File: todo/services/label_service.py:86-91
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:44:05.550Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend project, the GET v1/labels endpoint is designed to return only three fields in the response: id, name, and color. The prepare_label_dto method in todo/services/label_service.py intentionally excludes other LabelDTO fields like createdAt, updatedAt, createdBy, and updatedBy from the API response.
todo/repositories/task_repository.py (3)
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:98-112
Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z
Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#119
File: todo/repositories/task_repository.py:149-154
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T19:59:31.694Z
Learning: In the todo-backend project, per product requirements, tasks marked as deleted (isDeleted=True) should still be returned in user task queries. The get_tasks_for_user method in TaskRepository should not filter out deleted tasks, unlike typical soft deletion patterns.
Learnt from: VaibhavSingh8
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#81
File: todo/repositories/user_repository.py:47-55
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T19:35:44.948Z
Learning: The constant RepositoryErrors.USER_OPERATION_FAILED in todo/constants/messages.py is defined as "User operation failed" without any placeholder formatting like {0}.
todo/views/task.py (4)
Learnt from: VaibhavSingh8
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#81
File: todo_project/settings/base.py:70-77
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T18:05:07.813Z
Learning: The todo-backend project uses a custom pagination configuration system with `DEFAULT_PAGINATION_SETTINGS` nested under `REST_FRAMEWORK` in Django settings. This is not a DRF setting but a custom implementation used by their `PaginationConfig` class in `task_service.py`, serializers, and throughout their codebase. The configuration includes `DEFAULT_PAGE_LIMIT` and `MAX_PAGE_LIMIT` values.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:98-112
Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z
Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.
Learnt from: shobhan-sundar-goutam
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#95
File: todo/services/label_service.py:86-91
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:44:05.550Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend project, the GET v1/labels endpoint is designed to return only three fields in the response: id, name, and color. The prepare_label_dto method in todo/services/label_service.py intentionally excludes other LabelDTO fields like createdAt, updatedAt, createdBy, and updatedBy from the API response.
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#119
File: todo/repositories/task_repository.py:149-154
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T19:59:31.694Z
Learning: In the todo-backend project, per product requirements, tasks marked as deleted (isDeleted=True) should still be returned in user task queries. The get_tasks_for_user method in TaskRepository should not filter out deleted tasks, unlike typical soft deletion patterns.
todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py (2)
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:98-112
Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z
Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#75
File: todo/tests/integration/test_tasks_delete.py:20-23
Timestamp: 2025-06-08T15:58:01.548Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository, integration tests focus on API behavior (HTTP status codes, response structure) while unit tests handle verification of actual database operations and state changes. Database verification should not be added to integration tests.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (11)
todo/tests/unit/models/test_task.py (1)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
TaskAssignmentDTO(34-43)
todo/tests/integration/test_task_sorting_integration.py (1)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
TaskAssignmentDTO(34-43)
todo/services/user_service.py (1)
todo/repositories/task_assignment_repository.py (2)
TaskAssignmentRepository(9-209)get_by_assignee_id(46-63)
todo/dto/task_dto.py (1)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
TaskAssignmentDTO(34-43)
todo/dto/responses/create_task_assignment_response.py (1)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
TaskAssignmentDTO(34-43)
todo/tests/unit/views/test_task_assignment.py (1)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
TaskAssignmentDTO(34-43)
todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_task_repository.py (1)
todo/repositories/task_assignment_repository.py (1)
TaskAssignmentRepository(9-209)
todo/tests/integration/test_task_profile_api.py (2)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
TaskAssignmentDTO(34-43)todo/tests/integration/base_mongo_test.py (1)
AuthenticatedMongoTestCase(41-85)
todo/tests/fixtures/task.py (1)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
TaskAssignmentDTO(34-43)
todo/views/task.py (1)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
CreateTaskAssignmentDTO(7-31)
todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py (1)
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
TaskAssignmentDTO(34-43)
🔇 Additional comments (36)
todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_task_repository.py (1)
24-24: LGTM! Import addition aligns with refactoring effort.The import of
TaskAssignmentRepositoryis consistent with the broader refactoring fromAssigneeTaskDetailsRepositorytoTaskAssignmentRepositorymentioned in the PR objectives.todo/tests/unit/models/test_task.py (1)
7-8: LGTM! Import additions support the refactoring to TaskAssignmentDTO.These imports align with the broader refactoring from
AssigneeTaskDetailsDTOtoTaskAssignmentDTO. Thedatetimeimport is also appropriate sinceTaskAssignmentDTOincludes timestamp fields.todo/tests/integration/test_task_sorting_integration.py (1)
12-13: LGTM! Import additions are consistent with the refactoring effort.These imports align with the broader refactoring from legacy
AssigneeTaskDetailsDTOtoTaskAssignmentDTO. Thedatetimeimport supports the timestamp fields in the new DTO structure.todo/tests/integration/test_tasks_delete.py (2)
15-15: LGTM! Collection name change aligns with refactoring to TaskAssignment domain.The change from
assignee_task_detailstotask_detailsis consistent with the broader refactoring from the legacyAssigneeTaskDetailsmodel to the newTaskAssignmentmodel.
39-39: LGTM! Collection reference updated consistently.The collection reference is correctly updated to use
task_detailsinstead ofassignee_task_details, maintaining consistency with the refactoring effort.todo/tests/integration/test_task_update_api.py (2)
15-15: LGTM! Collection name change is consistent with the refactoring.The change from
assignee_task_detailstotask_detailsaligns with the broader refactoring to the newTaskAssignmentdomain model.
41-41: LGTM! Collection reference updated correctly.The collection reference is appropriately updated to use
task_details, maintaining consistency with the refactoring fromAssigneeTaskDetailstoTaskAssignment.todo/tests/integration/test_task_defer_api.py (2)
15-15: Collection name change looks correct.The change from
assignee_task_detailstotask_detailsaligns with the refactoring to use the new TaskAssignment model.
49-49: Collection name change is consistent.The insertion into
task_detailscollection is correct and consistent with the earlier cleanup change.todo/dto/task_dto.py (2)
11-11: Import update is correct.The change from
AssigneeInfoDTOtoTaskAssignmentDTOproperly reflects the new domain model structure.
21-21: Type annotation update is consistent.The field type correctly uses the new
TaskAssignmentDTOwhich provides richer assignment details with fields likeuser_type,is_active, and audit information.todo/dto/responses/create_task_assignment_response.py (2)
2-2: Import change is correct.The update to use
TaskAssignmentDTOaligns with the refactoring to the new domain model.
6-6: Response data type update is consistent.The change to use
TaskAssignmentDTOensures the response structure matches the new domain model with proper field names and types.todo/services/user_service.py (3)
11-11: Repository import addition is correct.The import of
TaskAssignmentRepositoryproperly supports the transition from the legacy assignee task details repository.
72-72: Repository method call update is correct.The change to use
TaskAssignmentRepository.get_by_assignee_idmaintains the same functionality while using the new domain model.
78-78: Team assignment repository call is consistent.The method call correctly uses the new repository for fetching team task assignments, maintaining the same logic for computing task intersection counts.
todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py (1)
50-50: Field name standardization is correct.The change from
relation_typetouser_typecreates consistency across all DTOs in the file and aligns with the broader refactoring to standardize field naming.todo/tests/unit/views/test_task_assignment.py (4)
7-7: LGTM: Import updated correctly for refactoring.The import change from
TaskAssignmentResponseDTOtoTaskAssignmentDTOaligns with the broader refactoring effort to consolidate DTOs.
29-37: LGTM: Mock DTO structure updated correctly.The mock
TaskAssignmentDTOcreation correctly reflects the new DTO structure without the legacy fields (assignee_name,updated_by,updated_at).
50-58: LGTM: Team assignment mock updated correctly.The mock
TaskAssignmentDTOfor team assignments correctly usesuser_type="team"and follows the updated DTO structure.
105-113: LGTM: Get assignment mock updated correctly.The mock
TaskAssignmentDTOfor the get operation maintains consistency with the new DTO structure across all test methods.todo/tests/integration/test_task_detail_api.py (3)
14-14: LGTM: Collection name updated for refactoring.The collection name change from
assignee_task_detailstotask_detailsaligns with the migration to the newTaskAssignmentmodel.
25-36: LGTM: Document structure updated for new model.The document structure changes correctly reflect the new
TaskAssignmentmodel:
- Field name updates:
relation_type→user_type- Type conversions: ObjectId → string for IDs
- Removal of legacy
is_action_takenfieldThese changes align with the broader refactoring effort.
55-56: LGTM: Assertions updated for new field names.The test assertions correctly validate the new field names (
assignee_idanduser_type) that correspond to the updatedTaskAssignmentmodel structure.todo/repositories/task_repository.py (4)
10-10: LGTM: Repository import updated for refactoring.The import change from
AssigneeTaskDetailsRepositorytoTaskAssignmentRepositoryis consistent with the broader refactoring effort.
57-57: LGTM: Repository usage updated correctly.The method call correctly uses the new
TaskAssignmentRepositorywhile maintaining the same method signature.
69-69: LGTM: Team assignment repository usage updated.The team assignment logic correctly uses the new
TaskAssignmentRepositorywith the same method interface.
169-169: LGTM: Deactivate operation updated correctly.The task deletion logic correctly uses the new
TaskAssignmentRepository.deactivate_by_task_idmethod.todo/tests/integration/test_task_profile_api.py (1)
14-14: LGTM: Simplified setup by leveraging base class.Good simplification removing redundant user creation logic. The
AuthenticatedMongoTestCasebase class already handles user creation and authentication setup.todo/tests/fixtures/task.py (3)
6-7: LGTM: Imports added for enhanced fixture structure.The new imports for
TaskAssignmentDTOanddatetimeare necessary for the updated fixture data structure and are properly utilized.
53-61: LGTM: Enhanced assignee structure with proper typing.The replacement of the simple dictionary with a fully typed
TaskAssignmentDTOinstance improves type safety and consistency with the new domain model. The structure includes all required fields and proper datetime handling.
78-86: LGTM: Consistent assignee structure across fixtures.The second task fixture correctly follows the same pattern as the first, maintaining consistency in the use of
TaskAssignmentDTOwith proper field values and typing.todo/repositories/task_assignment_repository.py (1)
177-209: LGTM! The implementation follows the established pattern.The new
deactivate_by_task_idmethod correctly:
- Follows the existing pattern of trying ObjectId first, then string format
- Uses
update_manyappropriately for deactivating all assignments- Properly updates metadata fields (is_active, updated_by, updated_at)
- Handles exceptions gracefully by returning False
todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py (1)
355-363: LGTM! DTO instantiations are properly updated.The
TaskAssignmentDTOinstances are correctly created with all required fields including the new metadata fields.Also applies to: 494-502
todo/services/task_assignment_service.py (1)
18-91: LGTM! Service properly refactored to use TaskAssignment model.The service has been successfully updated to:
- Use the new DTOs and models consistently
- Properly validate based on
user_typefield- Handle both user and team assignments correctly
- Return complete assignment information with metadata
todo/services/task_service.py (1)
161-162: LGTM! Assignment retrieval and DTO preparation properly updated.The code correctly:
- Uses TaskAssignmentRepository to retrieve assignments
- Prepares TaskAssignmentDTO with all required metadata fields
- Handles both user and team types appropriately
Also applies to: 205-230
| from bson import ObjectId | ||
| from todo.tests.integration.base_mongo_test import AuthenticatedMongoTestCase | ||
| from datetime import datetime, timezone | ||
| from todo.dto.task_assignment_dto import TaskAssignmentDTO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Remove unused import.
The TaskAssignmentDTO import is not used in the current code. Consider removing it to keep the imports clean.
-from todo.dto.task_assignment_dto import TaskAssignmentDTO📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from todo.dto.task_assignment_dto import TaskAssignmentDTO |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In todo/tests/integration/test_task_profile_api.py at line 6, the import of
TaskAssignmentDTO is unused. Remove this import statement to clean up the code
and avoid unnecessary imports.
| dto = CreateTaskAssignmentDTO( | ||
| task_id=task_id, assignee_id=serializer.validated_data["assignee_id"], relation_type="user" | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the field name to match the new DTO structure.
The CreateTaskAssignmentDTO expects user_type field, but the code is still using relation_type.
- dto = CreateTaskAssignmentDTO(
- task_id=task_id, assignee_id=serializer.validated_data["assignee_id"], relation_type="user"
- )
+ dto = CreateTaskAssignmentDTO(
+ task_id=task_id, assignee_id=serializer.validated_data["assignee_id"], user_type="user"
+ )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| dto = CreateTaskAssignmentDTO( | |
| task_id=task_id, assignee_id=serializer.validated_data["assignee_id"], relation_type="user" | |
| ) | |
| dto = CreateTaskAssignmentDTO( | |
| task_id=task_id, assignee_id=serializer.validated_data["assignee_id"], user_type="user" | |
| ) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In todo/views/task.py around lines 337 to 339, the CreateTaskAssignmentDTO is
being instantiated with a field named relation_type, but the DTO now expects a
field named user_type. Replace the relation_type argument with user_type and
assign it the value "user" to match the new DTO structure.
| # Also insert into assignee_task_details if this is a team assignment (legacy, can be removed if not needed) | ||
| # if dto.user_type == "team": | ||
| # TaskAssignmentRepository.create( | ||
| # TaskAssignmentModel( | ||
| # assignee_id=PyObjectId(dto.assignee_id), | ||
| # task_id=PyObjectId(dto.task_id), | ||
| # user_type="team", | ||
| # is_active=True, | ||
| # created_by=PyObjectId(user_id), | ||
| # updated_by=None, | ||
| # ) | ||
| # ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove the commented legacy code.
Since this is a refactor to remove the old AssigneeTaskDetails model, the commented legacy code should be removed entirely rather than left in the codebase.
- # Also insert into assignee_task_details if this is a team assignment (legacy, can be removed if not needed)
- # if dto.user_type == "team":
- # TaskAssignmentRepository.create(
- # TaskAssignmentModel(
- # assignee_id=PyObjectId(dto.assignee_id),
- # task_id=PyObjectId(dto.task_id),
- # user_type="team",
- # is_active=True,
- # created_by=PyObjectId(user_id),
- # updated_by=None,
- # )
- # )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Also insert into assignee_task_details if this is a team assignment (legacy, can be removed if not needed) | |
| # if dto.user_type == "team": | |
| # TaskAssignmentRepository.create( | |
| # TaskAssignmentModel( | |
| # assignee_id=PyObjectId(dto.assignee_id), | |
| # task_id=PyObjectId(dto.task_id), | |
| # user_type="team", | |
| # is_active=True, | |
| # created_by=PyObjectId(user_id), | |
| # updated_by=None, | |
| # ) | |
| # ) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In todo/services/task_assignment_service.py between lines 64 and 75, remove the
entire block of commented-out legacy code related to team assignments and the
AssigneeTaskDetails model, as it is no longer needed and should not remain in
the codebase.
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues... but I did find this kitten.
|\__/,| (`\
_.|o o |_ ) )
-(((---(((--------Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| todo/dto/responses/create_task_assignment_response.py | ✅ |
| todo/dto/task_assignment_dto.py | ✅ |
| todo/dto/task_dto.py | ✅ |
| todo/services/user_service.py | ✅ |
| todo/repositories/task_assignment_repository.py | ✅ |
| todo/services/task_assignment_service.py | ✅ |
| todo/repositories/task_repository.py | ✅ |
| todo/views/task.py | ✅ |
| todo/services/task_service.py | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Eliminated unnecessary imports from integration and unit test files related to task assignment, improving code clarity and maintainability. - Updated test files to reflect the current structure and dependencies, ensuring a cleaner codebase.
…est formatting - Streamlined the task assignment logic in UserService by removing unnecessary list comprehensions, enhancing code readability. - Updated test files to maintain consistent formatting for TaskAssignmentDTO, improving overall code clarity.
2 participants
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Refactor the codebase by removing the
AssigneeTaskDetailsDTOand related repository, and update all references to useTaskAssignmentDTOandTaskAssignmentRepositoryinstead.Why are these changes being made?
These changes aim to simplify the task assignment data model by consolidating all task assignment-related operations under the new
TaskAssignmentDTOandTaskAssignmentRepository, improving maintainability and consistency across the codebase. This also facilitates deprecating redundant code and prepares the system for future enhancements in task assignment management.