Skip to content

feat: add vision-alignment tiebreaker to task selection (task #0072)#225

Merged
fazxes merged 2 commits intomainfrom
feat/0072-vision-alignment-tiebreaker
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

feat: add vision-alignment tiebreaker to task selection (task #0072)#225
fazxes merged 2 commits intomainfrom
feat/0072-vision-alignment-tiebreaker

Conversation

@fazxes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fazxes fazxes commented Apr 9, 2026

Summary

  • Adds a vision-alignment tiebreaker paragraph to operators/build/SKILL.md after the "Value scoring" rule: when tasks are tied on priority and expected tracker impact, prefer the one targeting the lowest-percentage vision section in TRACKER.md
  • Adds a "Vision-alignment tiebreaker in task selection" subsection to tasks/GUIDE.md with the full rule, application steps, and a worked example using real tracker percentages (Self-Maintaining 68% vs Meta-Prompt 79%)
  • Marks task feat: sub-agent coordination module for Loop 2 #72 done (completed: 2026-04-08)

Rule is advisory -- agent uses judgment. If no ready tasks exist for the starved section, pick the best available and note the gap in the handoff.

Test plan

  • make check passes (verified locally: all checks passed)
  • No nightshift/ files modified
  • Tiebreaker rule present in operators/build/SKILL.md under Task Selection
  • GUIDE.md subsection present with worked example
  • Task feat: sub-agent coordination module for Loop 2 #72 status is done with completed: 2026-04-08

fazxes added 2 commits April 8, 2026 21:34
When tasks tie on priority and expected tracker impact, the build
operator now prefers the task targeting the lowest-percentage vision
section in TRACKER.md. Rule documented in SKILL.md and GUIDE.md
with a worked example. Advisory only -- no code change required.
@fazxes fazxes merged commit 22ad9e1 into main Apr 9, 2026
7 checks passed
@fazxes fazxes deleted the feat/0072-vision-alignment-tiebreaker branch April 9, 2026 01:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant