Skip to content

Conversation

@alonre24
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@alonre24 alonre24 requested a review from DvirDukhan November 30, 2020 13:50
@alonre24 alonre24 self-assigned this Nov 30, 2020
lantiga
lantiga previously approved these changes Nov 30, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@lantiga lantiga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good but there's a tab in there :-)

…d decrease the ref_count when a DAG op is finished. The original free function will be called at the end of the entire DAG run and assumes that there are no more copies of the DAG runInfo.
@alonre24 alonre24 force-pushed the Make_ref_count_atomic_read branch from a38af82 to 037c97f Compare December 1, 2020 13:17
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #520 (8654840) into master (1d173ff) will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #520      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.21%   75.30%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        5164     5167       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3884     3891       +7     
+ Misses       1280     1276       -4     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/background_workers.c 87.11% <100.00%> (-0.14%) ⬇️
src/dag.c 88.55% <100.00%> (ø)
src/run_info.c 70.31% <100.00%> (+2.93%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1d173ff...8654840. Read the comment docs.

@alonre24 alonre24 merged commit 15c6bf1 into master Dec 1, 2020
@alonre24 alonre24 deleted the Make_ref_count_atomic_read branch December 1, 2020 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants