-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
Open
Description
While solving a linear least squares problem of a skinny matrix using PDGEQRF, PDORMQR, and PDTRTRS, the latter returned info = -904, which denotes that the 4th entry of the 9th argument had an illegal value.
Excerpts from pdtrtrs.f:
! 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
PDTRTRS( UPLO, TRANS, DIAG, N, NRHS, A, IA, JA, DESCA, B, IB, JB, DESCB, INFO ) PARAMETER ( BLOCK_CYCLIC_2D = 1, DLEN_ = 9, DTYPE_ = 1,
$ CTXT_ = 2, M_ = 3, N_ = 4, MB_ = 5, NB_ = 6,
$ RSRC_ = 7, CSRC_ = 8, LLD_ = 9 )* M_A (global) DESCA( M_ ) The number of rows in the global
* array A.
* N_A (global) DESCA( N_ ) The number of columns in the global
* array A.
* MB_A (global) DESCA( MB_ ) The blocking factor used to distribute
* the rows of the array.
* NB_A (global) DESCA( NB_ ) The blocking factor used to distribute
* the columns of the array.But the check for this error involves the 5th (MB_) and 6th (NB_) entry of the the 9th (DESCA) argument instead of the 4th (N_).
ELSE IF( DESCA( MB_ ).NE.DESCA( NB_ ) ) THEN
INFO = -904- Is this on purpose?
- Why do the blocking factors for rows and columns have to be equal? Is this documented?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels