Improve C# IEnumerable implementation#60
Merged
ralreegorganon merged 4 commits intomasterfrom Jul 1, 2014
Merged
Conversation
This introduces test failures for c# that still need to be resolved.
Return a KeyValuePair<string,dynamic> so the key isn't lost.
Contributor
|
Since we have a changelog now, I guess this should include entries for it. As for removing the commits from #53, I think this is fine how it is, and we can worry about those details later. 👍 |
Member
Author
|
Was already in the progress of adding the changelog entry once that was merged. Once the CI build is complete I'll merge it. |
ralreegorganon
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2014
Improve C# IEnumerable implementation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pulls the C# related commits from #53 so that I can move forward with some work with the alpha while we figure out how we want to handle the other language implementations before merging #53.
I contemplated removing these commits from the arrays branch of #53 completely, but opted to leave them. If we want to go the other way, just let me know.