chore: Update mockserver image to RocketChat org

[KevLehman]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

https://rocketchat.atlassian.net/browse/PRD-329

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated mock-server container image to a specific pinned version for improved consistency and reliability in CI environments.
  • Updated YAML configuration formatting in docker-compose file.

[dionisio-bot]

Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉
If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: c4c43ad

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2503789f-45d6-42f3-b6c6-189c3c0c4158

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d19209 and c4c43ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docker-compose-ci.yml

📜 Recent review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: cubic · AI code reviewer

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (1)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: smirk-dev
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39625
File: apps/meteor/app/api/server/v1/push.ts:85-97
Timestamp: 2026-03-14T14:58:58.834Z
Learning: In RocketChat/Rocket.Chat, the `push.token` POST/DELETE endpoints in `apps/meteor/app/api/server/v1/push.ts` were already migrated to the chained router API pattern on `develop` prior to PR `#39625`. `cleanTokenResult` (which strips `authToken` and returns `PushTokenResult`) and `isPushTokenPOSTProps`/`isPushTokenDELETEProps` validators already exist on `develop`. PR `#39625` only migrates `push.get` and `push.info` to the chained pattern. Do not flag `cleanTokenResult` or `PushTokenResult` as newly introduced behavior-breaking changes when reviewing this PR.

Learnt from: ggazzo
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 35995
File: apps/meteor/app/api/server/v1/rooms.ts:1107-1112
Timestamp: 2026-02-23T17:53:18.785Z
Learning: In Rocket.Chat PR reviews, maintain strict scope boundaries—when a PR is focused on a specific endpoint (e.g., rooms.favorite), avoid reviewing or suggesting changes to other endpoints that were incidentally refactored (e.g., rooms.invite) unless explicitly requested by maintainers.

Learnt from: ahmed-n-abdeltwab
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 38974
File: apps/meteor/app/api/server/v1/im.ts:220-221
Timestamp: 2026-02-24T19:09:09.561Z
Learning: In RocketChat/Rocket.Chat OpenAPI migration PRs for apps/meteor/app/api/server/v1 endpoints, maintainers prefer to avoid any logic changes; style-only cleanups (like removing inline comments) may be deferred to follow-ups to keep scope tight.

Learnt from: ahmed-n-abdeltwab
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-02-24T19:05:56.710Z
Learning: Rocket.Chat repo context: When a workspace manifest on develop already pins a dependency version (e.g., packages/web-ui-registration → "rocket.chat/ui-contexts": "27.0.1"), a lockfile change in a feature PR that upgrades only that dependency’s resolution is considered a manifest-driven sync and can be kept, preferably as a small "chore: sync yarn.lock with manifests" commit.

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docker-compose-ci.yml (1)

203-213: LGTM!

Switching to the org-scoped ghcr.io/rocketchat/mockserver image and pinning by SHA256 digest aligns with the PR objective (PRD-329) and yields an immutable, reproducible pull. CI workflows already authenticate to ghcr.io (see .github/workflows/ci-test-e2e.yml and .github/workflows/ci.yml), so image access is covered. The healthcheck quote-style change is cosmetically equivalent YAML with no behavioral impact.

---

Walkthrough

Updated the mock-server service container image in docker-compose-ci.yml from a personal repository tag to a Rocket.Chat-hosted image pinned by SHA256 digest. Also adjusted the healthcheck test command formatting from double-quoted to single-quoted YAML list syntax.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Docker Compose Configuration docker-compose-ci.yml	Updated mock-server image reference from kaleman14/mockserver:latest to ghcr.io/rocketchat/mockserver@sha256:... for organizational image management. Changed healthcheck test array syntax from double-quoted to single-quoted list representation without altering functionality.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels

type: chore

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: updating the mockserver image to use the RocketChat organization.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The code changes meet the requirement from PRD-329 by replacing the personal kaleman14/mockserver image with the RocketChat-scoped ghcr.io/rocketchat/mockserver image.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are directly related to the stated objective of replacing the personal Docker image with the RocketChat-scoped image; no unrelated modifications detected.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.04%. Comparing base (7d19209) to head (c4c43ad).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #40205      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    70.07%   70.04%   -0.03%     
===========================================
  Files         3289     3289              
  Lines       117541   117541              
  Branches     20844    20846       +2     
===========================================
- Hits         82361    82335      -26     
- Misses       31890    31900      +10     
- Partials      3290     3306      +16     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	59.66% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
e2e-api	46.20% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
unit	70.91% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 1 file