[GHI #112] Tom Select Revisited #120
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Jeremy-Walton
added
Cleanup
Closed
Jeremy-Walton
commented
Jan 6, 2023
Jeremy-Walton
force-pushed
the
ghi-112-tom-select-revisited
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f4dfd35 to
8571e8b
Compare
Jeremy-Walton
force-pushed
the
ghi-112-tom-select-revisited
branch
from
8571e8b to
ff4f35c
Compare
Jeremy-Walton
force-pushed
the
ghi-112-tom-select-revisited
branch
from
ff4f35c to
e8d0ad4
Compare
Member
Author
|
Reviewed in Person with @scriswell . He gave 👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Task
#112
Why?
The Tom Select Addon that provides styling for tom select that matches our system seems to make too many assumptions and usually needs to be further styled when pulled into an app.
What Changed
Sanity Check
Do you need to update the package version?Screenshots