docs: Add Documentation of Shell Integration for Cygwin + Fish Setup

[fatihaziz]

• Document setup for Fish terminal in Cygwin within VS Code.
• Provide step-by-step guide for shell integration.
• Include workaround for VSCode terminal profile configuration.
• Add visual aid for integration verification.

---

Important

Adds documentation for setting up Fish shell integration in Cygwin within VS Code, including configuration steps and verification methods.

• Documentation:
  • Adds section for Fish shell integration in Cygwin within shell-integration.md.
  • Provides step-by-step guide for setting up Fish terminal in Cygwin with VS Code.
  • Includes workaround for configuring VS Code terminal profile for Fish.
  • Adds visual aid for verifying integration.

^{This description was created by for 0955e9c. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

@fatihaziz is attempting to deploy a commit to the Roo Code Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 0955e9c in 2 minutes and 50 seconds

More details

• Looked at 85 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 1 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. docs/features/shell-integration.md:233

• Draft comment:
  Consider rewording this sentence for clarity; e.g., 'here's how to get VS Code's shell integration working' rather than 'here's how VS Code's shell integration working'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
  While the comment identifies a real grammatical error, our rules state we should focus on code logic issues, not documentation wording or style. The meaning is still clear despite the minor grammatical error. This seems like a nitpick that doesn't materially improve the content.
  The grammar error could make the documentation look unprofessional and might momentarily confuse non-native English speakers.
  While valid, this level of nitpicking on documentation wording goes against our rules of focusing on substantive issues that require code changes. The meaning remains clear despite the minor error.
  Delete this comment as it focuses on minor documentation wording rather than substantive code or logic issues.

2. docs/features/shell-integration.md:233

• Draft comment:
  Typo: Consider replacing 'working' with 'works' in the sentence about shell integration.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  While this is a valid grammatical correction, our rules state that we should not make purely informative comments or obvious corrections. Grammar fixes in documentation are not critical code changes that require review comments. The meaning is still clear despite the minor grammatical error.
  The grammar error could make the documentation look unprofessional. Documentation quality is important for user experience.
  While documentation quality matters, minor grammar fixes can be handled directly through PR suggestions or separate documentation reviews. This doesn't warrant a review comment based on our standards.
  Delete this comment as it's a minor grammatical suggestion that doesn't align with our review standards focusing on substantive code changes.

3. docs/features/shell-integration.md:279

• Draft comment:
  JSON snippet issue: Duplicate 'fish' keys may override settings. Consider separating alternative configurations into distinct examples or commenting one out.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

Workflow ID: wflow_TtfVYKQoazc4qux1

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[KJ7LNW]

@hannesrudolph lgtm