update pretext version and refresh some files

[StevenClontz]

Oscar and I are working with John Cigas and this PR reflects any tweaks I would suggest.

[StevenClontz]

I doubt this will fix all the problems, but maybe this gets things moving in the right direction.

[bnmnetp]

Wow! You all had a very productive dropin today!

[cigas]

Found the (first!) real problem. It was from adding <introduction> divisions around <exercise>
from Eliminate Warnings on Build #253

[StevenClontz]

Ah ha. Yup, introduction isn't as permissive as other content areas.

[StevenClontz]

Something that surprises me here: @oscarlevin's pretext-tools plugin doesn't fire any warnings when I look at

in Codespaces. Is this my user error or a bug?

[oscarlevin]

What sort of warnings are you expecting? Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Steven Clontz ***@***.***> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 4:47:29 PM To: RunestoneInteractive/thinkcspy ***@***.***> Cc: Levin, Oscar ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [RunestoneInteractive/thinkcspy] update pretext version and refresh some files (PR #259) [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ] Something that surprises me here: @oscarlevin<https://github.com/oscarlevin>'s pretext-tools plugin doesn't fire any warnings when I look at [image]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1559632/247303824-0b2e7073-22a4-48ee-8b40-8d0659d7af63.png> in Codespaces. Is this my user error or a bug? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#259 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRUBFHKBNC3IYNX6ZXR2F3XMISADANCNFSM6AAAAAAZNZGRX4>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[StevenClontz]

Maybe I'm confused on the issue. Is an exercise allowed by the schema in the introduction of a section? https://pretextbook.org/doc/schema/schemas/pretext_xsd/elements/introduction.html seems to suggest that's okay.

[oscarlevin]

Ah, I didn't notice that. I'm not sure what the current status of numbered elements in an introduction is. It is possible that the schema still says that is okay, but Rob wants to change it. Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Steven Clontz ***@***.***> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 5:09:01 PM To: RunestoneInteractive/thinkcspy ***@***.***> Cc: Levin, Oscar ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [RunestoneInteractive/thinkcspy] update pretext version and refresh some files (PR #259) [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ] Maybe I'm confused on the issue. Is an exercise allowed by the schema in the introduction of a section? https://pretextbook.org/doc/schema/schemas/pretext_xsd/elements/introduction.html seems to suggest that's okay. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#259 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRUBFE6NVW5EVHEL4TCFKDXMIUQ3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAZNZGRX4>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>