draft text for project goals, please comment #3
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <alice.i.cecile@gmail.com>
goals.md
Outdated
| - combining the best ideas and code from existing projects. | ||
|
|
||
| # What | ||
| - a crate being a good base: We can implement all the needed use cases with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What are the core use cases? Who wants to use audio crates in Rust? Are there key tradeoffs in the space?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes we should have those here. I have some answers to those questions but they are bound to be incorrect. I propose we
- collect all possible use cases. If possible with some user story/context around those. To that end I have added what I know from Rodio.
- document the tradeoffs
- select which to focus on (the core use case).
alice-i-cecile
left a comment
alice-i-cecile
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Generally could use a rewrite for grammar / writing quality: ping me when the content is done and I'll be happy to draft something up for you quick.
Very much a draft, I have added everything we currently have & want from the rodio side. Since I know little of what Kira and Firewheel provide or what Bevy needs (ECS what is that dark magic?!) I left that TODO.
|
I think it would be helpful to explain how the Firewheel engine can be used to meet all of these goals. If you don't mind, I would like to write up my own draft text for project goals coming from own perspective. Then we can look into merging our drafts together. |
Good idea, I've added you to the repo feel free to push directly to main or open a PR. Let me know if you need anything. |
|
Alright, I added my own text to the document! |
Update goals.md
While great additions goals was getting quite long. Future changes will reference these sections again. Secondly this change makes it easier to extend those sections in the future.
|
I am still working on incorporating the changes. Looking back project goals as a title was not a good starting point :) |
|
I've moved things around. There is now one short Readme with multiple supporting pieces.
We have a good base now, provided there are no major objections I would like to merge this as is. Further changes would then be new new PR's. |
alice-i-cecile
left a comment
alice-i-cecile
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No major objections. Bother me for an editing pass before widespread publication but I agree on merging.
reviews might be a good way to discuss this. We can merge it once we largely agree.
For big changes/additions a PR is probably best.