Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Given this requires a function-per-encoding, I'm beginning to wonder if it might be helpful to have an |
To make it easier to support the "crypt" encoding (which is slightly different from the others as the alphabet is shifted), this change refactors encoders to support an arbitrary `encode_6bits` function per-encoding.
tarcieri
force-pushed
the
base64ct/refactor-encoder-functions
branch
from
4a9f1e9 to
eb016e8
Compare
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To make it easier to support the "crypt" encoding (which is slightly different from the others as the alphabet is shifted), this change refactors encoders to support an arbitrary
encode_6bitsfunction per-encoding.