-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Another way to deal with splitting #60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
I like these changes, will update my dataloader to fit with these changes and separate out the downloading. Then we only downlaod the MNIST once @hzavadil98. |
sot176
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that is a great way to separate out the downloading from the dataset class. It makes the code more cleaner :)
I will adjust my dataset class to this new format!
|
Nice work 👍 I added mnist downloader and adjusted my dataset. I also had to make a few minor changes with parameter passing which got a bit more complicated. I will now merge with my previous PR so that there is only one spot to push the changes. |
As mentioned in my response to #53, here are a few changes I think we could consider that might simplify the splitting a bit.
Thoughts?
Note that this pull-request is not to merge with main, but with @hzavadil98's dataloader pull request