chore: add CodeRabbit config

[SSobol77]

Initial CodeRabbit configuration for ECLI.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated automated code review configuration to enhance quality checks and analysis coverage, while optimizing file exclusions for build artifacts and generated files.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated .coderabbit.yaml to enable automated code reviews with an assertive request-changes workflow, comprehensive path filters excluding build artifacts and releases, and a suite of repository quality analysis tools including ruff, shellcheck, hadolint, yamllint, markdownlint, actionlint, and gitleaks.

Changes

CodeRabbit Automated Review Configuration

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Automated review and analysis tools configuration .coderabbit.yaml	Enabled auto_review with draft reviews disabled, added assertive review profile with request-changes workflow, configured broad path_filters to exclude releases, build artifacts, caches, binary and log files, documentation PDFs, and images. Enabled ruff, shellcheck, hadolint, yamllint, markdownlint, actionlint, and gitleaks tools while disabling chat auto-replies.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 The bunny hops through code with cheer,
With ruff and lint tools standing near,
Path filters block the noise and clutter,
Auto-reviews make changes flutter,
Quality checks now automated clear!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'chore: add CodeRabbit config' clearly and specifically describes the main change—adding CodeRabbit configuration to the repository.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/coderabbit-config

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[SSobol77]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.coderabbit.yaml (1)

44-45: ⚡ Quick win

Consider keeping lockfiles in review scope.

Excluding uv.lock and thirdparty.lock can hide dependency and supply-chain changes from automated review. If those files are authoritative, it’s safer to review them.

Suggested change

-    - "!uv.lock"
-    - "!thirdparty.lock"

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 44 - 45, Remove the exclusion of authoritative
lockfiles from the review scope by deleting or disabling the entries "!uv.lock"
and "!thirdparty.lock" in .coderabbit.yaml so those lockfiles are included in
automated reviews; update the .coderabbit.yaml config to stop ignoring uv.lock
and thirdparty.lock (or replace the negation entries with explicit include
rules) to ensure dependency/supply-chain changes are surfaced.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 43: The path filter contains a typo: the single segment "AppDirpackaging"
should be two segments ("AppDir" and "packaging"); update the filter string in
.coderabbit.yaml by replacing "!packaging/linux/appimage/AppDirpackaging/**"
with the corrected path that splits the segments (e.g.
"!packaging/linux/appimage/AppDir/packaging/**") so it correctly matches the
intended directory.

---

Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 44-45: Remove the exclusion of authoritative lockfiles from the
review scope by deleting or disabling the entries "!uv.lock" and
"!thirdparty.lock" in .coderabbit.yaml so those lockfiles are included in
automated reviews; update the .coderabbit.yaml config to stop ignoring uv.lock
and thirdparty.lock (or replace the negation entries with explicit include
rules) to ensure dependency/supply-chain changes are surfaced.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 53041b26-612e-4d13-acda-48e8610b2df2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e66e9f7 and 2dbd2f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yaml

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Fix the likely typo in the path filter.

Line 43 uses AppDirpackaging as a single segment, which likely won’t match the intended directory and may leave files unexpectedly included in reviews.

Suggested fix

-    - "!packaging/linux/appimage/AppDirpackaging/**"
+    - "!packaging/linux/appimage/AppDir/packaging/**"

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 43, The path filter contains a typo: the single
segment "AppDirpackaging" should be two segments ("AppDir" and "packaging");
update the filter string in .coderabbit.yaml by replacing
"!packaging/linux/appimage/AppDirpackaging/**" with the corrected path that
splits the segments (e.g. "!packaging/linux/appimage/AppDir/packaging/**") so it
correctly matches the intended directory.