Skip to content

Conversation

@trexfeathers
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Pull Request

Description

Closes #6427

@pp-mo you've made the link-check process so much less painful. Chapeau 🎩


Consult Iris pull request check list


Add any of the below labels to trigger actions on this PR:

  • benchmark_this Request that this pull request be benchmarked to check if it introduces performance shifts

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.80%. Comparing base (90e36fe) to head (4213ab3).
⚠️ Report is 101 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6429   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.80%   89.80%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines       23752    23752           
  Branches     4418     4418           
=======================================
  Hits        21331    21331           
  Misses       1672     1672           
  Partials      749      749           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@trexfeathers trexfeathers linked an issue May 1, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@rcomer rcomer merged commit c0b5ac5 into SciTools:main May 1, 2025
21 checks passed
@trexfeathers
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @rcomer!

@scitools-ci scitools-ci bot removed this from 🚴 Peloton May 30, 2025
@trexfeathers trexfeathers deleted the fix-link branch August 22, 2025 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Link Checker Report Link Checker Report

2 participants