Skip to content

Conversation

@Scirelgar
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@Scirelgar Scirelgar force-pushed the better-reporting-workflow branch 9 times, most recently from 698e5ba to 88a72a0 Compare March 5, 2025 21:13
@Scirelgar Scirelgar force-pushed the better-reporting-workflow branch from 88a72a0 to ca406cf Compare March 5, 2025 21:25
@Scirelgar Scirelgar force-pushed the better-reporting-workflow branch from f60b55b to 566d59a Compare March 6, 2025 17:49
@Scirelgar Scirelgar force-pushed the better-reporting-workflow branch from 566d59a to 6049941 Compare March 6, 2025 17:51
@Scirelgar Scirelgar marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2025 18:35
@Scirelgar Scirelgar merged commit 03bfc04 into dev Mar 6, 2025
1 of 3 checks passed
Scirelgar added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2025
* enhance PDK workflow with validation results annotation

* switch to inline command for run property in pdk_tests.yaml

* replacing shell script by python script to parse xml formatted result of `pdk validate`

* setting up pdk manually, rather than having to install python in container

* piping the output of `pdk validate` to pdk-validate annotation script

* using job environment variable to define directory targeted by scan
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants