While poking around in the 80286 test files (as of 37c73ca), I noticed that the values in the META chunk's test_ct field don't match the description in the 1.1 format documentation.
Specifically, the META::test_ct docs say that the field should contain the number of tests in the current file (and match the test count in the MOO chunk), but in practice the META::test_ct field appears to instead contain a cumulative total of all tests in the suite, up to and including the current file.
For example:
00.MOO.gz has MOO::test_count = 5000 and META::test_ct = 5000 as expected.01.MOO.gz has MOO::test_count = 5000, but META::test_ct = 10000.02.MOO.gz has MOO::test_count = 5000, but META::test_ct = 15000, and so on.
I'm not sure whether this is a problem in the test files themselves, or in the format docs.
While poking around in the 80286 test files (as of 37c73ca), I noticed that the values in the
METAchunk'stest_ctfield don't match the description in the 1.1 format documentation.Specifically, the
META::test_ctdocs say that the field should contain the number of tests in the current file (and match the test count in theMOOchunk), but in practice theMETA::test_ctfield appears to instead contain a cumulative total of all tests in the suite, up to and including the current file.For example:
00.MOO.gzhasMOO::test_count = 5000andMETA::test_ct = 5000as expected.01.MOO.gzhasMOO::test_count = 5000, butMETA::test_ct = 10000.02.MOO.gzhasMOO::test_count = 5000, butMETA::test_ct = 15000, and so on.I'm not sure whether this is a problem in the test files themselves, or in the format docs.