Skip to content

Prettify the graph visualizations#238

Merged
svij-sc merged 23 commits intomainfrom
svij/walkthrough-changes
Aug 2, 2025
Merged

Prettify the graph visualizations#238
svij-sc merged 23 commits intomainfrom
svij/walkthrough-changes

Conversation

@svij-sc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@svij-sc svij-sc commented Jul 30, 2025

The graph visualizations were very clutered; this change improves the visualizations

Category Before After
Bi-Partite Graphs output image
Homogeneous Graph beforeout image
Training Sample trainingsamplebefore image

Scope of work done

  • Introduced changes to graph visualizer
  • I have updated the tabularized notebook.
  • For the in-memory notebook I only ran the first visualization cell to validate this works for bi-partite graphs.

Where is the documentation for this feature?: N/A

Did you add automated tests or write a test plan?

Updated Changelog.md? NO

Ready for code review?: YES

@svij-sc svij-sc changed the title init prettify the graph visualizations Jul 31, 2025
@svij-sc svij-sc changed the title prettify the graph visualizations Prettify the graph visualizations Jul 31, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mkolodner-sc mkolodner-sc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Shubham! I can't leave comments on the toy_example_walkthrough since the diffs are too large, but generally the heterogeneous walkthrough visualizations LGTM. I can stamp once we figure out a solution for the isolated node visualizations in the tabularized notebook, thanks!

Comment thread examples/tutorial/KDD_2025/heteregeneous_walkthrough.ipynb
Comment thread python/gigl/common/utils/jupyter_magics.py
Comment thread python/gigl/common/utils/jupyter_magics.py
Comment thread python/gigl/common/utils/jupyter_magics.py
Comment thread examples/tutorial/KDD_2025/heteregeneous_walkthrough.ipynb Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mkolodner-sc mkolodner-sc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix with the visualizations! They look great to me.

@svij-sc svij-sc marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2025 23:39
@svij-sc svij-sc added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 2, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Aug 2, 2025
@svij-sc svij-sc added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 2, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Aug 2, 2025
@svij-sc svij-sc added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 2, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Aug 2, 2025
@svij-sc svij-sc added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 2, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit cbe3147 Aug 2, 2025
5 checks passed
@svij-sc svij-sc deleted the svij/walkthrough-changes branch August 2, 2025 05:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants