Add remote_dataset for graph store mode#386
Merged
kmontemayor2-sc merged 7 commits intomainfrom Nov 24, 2025
Merged
Conversation
svij-sc
reviewed
Nov 14, 2025
Collaborator
Author
|
/unit_test_py |
Contributor
GiGL Automation@ 19:52:18UTC : 🔄 @ 20:51:46UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully. |
svij-sc
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2025
Collaborator
svij-sc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we add docstrings?
Left some other suggestions below.
mkolodner-sc
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope of work done
We need to be able to "fetch" data from the servers so I'm exposing util functions to do so.
NOTE: Ideally these would be exposed via
DistServer1 so we could call them directly.Where is the documentation for this feature?: N/A
Did you add automated tests or write a test plan?
Updated Changelog.md? NO
Ready for code review?: NO