So this isn’t a full-on conlang or some polished framework. It’s an idea I started playing with using AI—kind of a rethink on how we use language across cultures, translation layers, and emotional tone. Something lighter, clearer, and more adaptable than most natural or constructed languages we have now.
The goal: make communication suck less—especially across barriers. What if we could design a protocol that keeps emotional nuance, simplifies structure, and still feels natural to speak or write in?
- A protocol, not a language. Think of it like a middleware for meaning.
- Built on core grammar that's easy to parse and layer on top of.
- Designed to work with AI tools, voice, sketch, whatever.
- Tries to keep emotional/cultural context without needing emoji or tone tags.
- Not academically correct. I’m not a linguist.
- Not a replacement for real languages.
- Not claiming to be “the one true conlang.”
- GCC (Global Conversational Constants): Stuff like "hey, I'm being sincere" or "this is sarcasm" embedded in tone/word choice, not tags.
- Rhythmic clarity: Sound design and flow matter. Harmony in speech helps with understanding, especially across translation.
- SVO but flexible: Subject-Verb-Object base, but not strict.
- Semantic scaffolding: Words are modular and layered—like you can stack meaning.
Mostly? Because no one's really using AI like this yet. And because language is harder than it should be, both to learn and to use naturally—especially when you add tech or translation into the mix.
I don’t know if this goes anywhere, but I figured it was worth putting out there.
[coming soon – feel free to check back or DM me if you're interested]
Feel free to clone this and go nuts. Feedback welcome, especially from people who know more than me. I just wanted to see what would happen if we started over from scratch, with meaning and usability first.