Skip to content

Bump pipewire to 0.10#144

Merged
SolarLiner merged 2 commits into
SolarLiner:mainfrom
tonarino:pipewire-0.10
May 30, 2026
Merged

Bump pipewire to 0.10#144
SolarLiner merged 2 commits into
SolarLiner:mainfrom
tonarino:pipewire-0.10

Conversation

@mbernat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mbernat mbernat commented May 27, 2026

Description

The pipewire crate on version 0.8 used in main seems to break when upgrading the libpipewire system lib to 1.6.

The hope is that merely updating pipewire to 0.10 fixes the problem, while continuing to work on libpipewire 1.4.

Pipewire 0.9 had quite a few breaking changes but they seem to be fairly straightforward renames.

  • Context -> ContextRc
  • MainLoop -> MainLoopRc
  • Properties -> PropertiesBox
  • Stream -> StreamBox

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested on our production system that uses interflow and pipewire extensively.

  • All audio features continue working with libpipewire 1.4
  • All audio features continue working with libpipewire 1.6

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Wherever possible, I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. For changes that
    need to be validated manually (i.e. a new audio driver), use examples that can be run to easily validate them.
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Additional Notes:

Add any additional notes about the PR here.

mbernat added 2 commits May 25, 2026 15:24
- Context -> ContextRc
- MainLoop -> MainLoopRc
- Properties -> PropertiesBox
- Stream -> StreamBox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@strohel strohel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @mbernat, FWIW this looks good to me. There wasn't really anything else than the type renames, right?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@SolarLiner SolarLiner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SolarLiner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

SolarLiner commented May 30, 2026

I'm gonna "fast track" as it were this one, and rebase #143 on this to see if this solves my linux woes

@SolarLiner SolarLiner merged commit 689622f into SolarLiner:main May 30, 2026
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants