Skip to content

Conversation

@fkr
Copy link
Member

@fkr fkr commented Sep 2, 2025

No description provided.

@garloff
Copy link
Member

garloff commented Sep 2, 2025

I improved the wording a bit (and fixed two typos along the way).
No change wr.t. content, but a second set of eyes might be useful.

@garloff garloff changed the title stablelize this stabilize this Sep 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@depressiveRobot depressiveRobot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed one more typo. Looks good to me now.

@fkr fkr changed the title stabilize this stabilize SCS-121-w1 Sep 3, 2025
@fkr
Copy link
Member Author

fkr commented Sep 3, 2025

we should revert my change (and keep @garloff his improvements), see #980

@fkr
Copy link
Member Author

fkr commented Sep 3, 2025

we should revert my change (and keep @garloff his improvements), see #980

done

Copy link
Member

@garloff garloff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@mbuechse mbuechse changed the title stabilize SCS-121-w1 Improve language in SCS-121-w1 Sep 10, 2025
garloff and others added 4 commits September 10, 2025 10:27
This is only to improve English language without any changes w.r.t.
content.

Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>
Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Frommhold <depressiveRobot@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
@mbuechse mbuechse force-pushed the feat/stabilize-scs-121-w1 branch from da61f89 to 1bce0d6 Compare September 10, 2025 08:29
@mbuechse mbuechse merged commit 4047909 into main Sep 10, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@mbuechse mbuechse deleted the feat/stabilize-scs-121-w1 branch September 10, 2025 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants