Skip to content

chore: bump DAWGS to 0.5.1 BED-6695#2795

Merged
seanjSO merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
seanj/BED-6695
May 20, 2026
Merged

chore: bump DAWGS to 0.5.1 BED-6695#2795
seanjSO merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
seanj/BED-6695

Conversation

@seanjSO
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@seanjSO seanjSO commented May 19, 2026

Description

Bump DAWGS to 0.5.1

Motivation and Context

Resolves BED-6695

Fixes traversal correlation issues. https://github.com/SpecterOps/DAWGS/pull/73/changes

How Has This Been Tested?

DAWGS-side translation and integration tests

Screenshots (optional):

Types of changes

  • Chore (a change that does not modify the application functionality)

Checklist:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated a core dependency with a patch bump to v0.5.1, bringing minor fixes and improvements.

Review Change Stack

@seanjSO seanjSO self-assigned this May 19, 2026
@seanjSO seanjSO added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label May 19, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 19, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fdf564de-3a4f-4f99-88a2-e124cd02f6c7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2272d71 and b42c559.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • go.mod

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The direct dependency github.com/specterops/dawgs was bumped from v0.5.0 to v0.5.1 in go.mod. No other dependencies, directives, or configuration changes are included.

Changes

Dependency Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Bump dawgs to v0.5.1
go.mod
The github.com/specterops/dawgs direct dependency version is incremented from v0.5.0 to v0.5.1.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • benwaples
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically identifies the main change: bumping the DAWGS dependency to version 0.5.1, and includes the Jira ticket reference.
Description check ✅ Passed The description follows the template structure with all key sections completed: description, motivation/context with ticket reference, testing details, change type selection, and checklist items marked as complete.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch seanj/BED-6695

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot added the infrastructure A pull request containing changes affecting the infrastructure code. label May 19, 2026
@seanjSO seanjSO merged commit 5e263ba into main May 20, 2026
13 checks passed
@seanjSO seanjSO deleted the seanj/BED-6695 branch May 20, 2026 15:10
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 20, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file infrastructure A pull request containing changes affecting the infrastructure code.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants