OpenGraph Library: Add IDMHound and ProfileHound

[jeff-matthews]

Purpose

This pull request (PR) adds new OpenGraph Library projects.

Closes #140
Closes #147

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added ProfileHound to the library—a post-escalation tool for locating user profiles on machines and establishing profile relationships.
  • Added IDMHound to the library—a FreeIPA/Red Hat Identity Management collector that gathers users, groups, and computers with relationship mapping.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request adds two new OpenGraph project entries to the library documentation: ProfileHound (a post-escalation tool for Active Directory user profile enumeration) and IDMHound (a FreeIPA/Red Hat Identity Management collector). These entries include descriptions, authors, and repository links.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
OpenGraph Library Documentation docs/opengraph/library.mdx	Added ProfileHound entry under Active Directory/ManagerOfHound section describing user profile enumeration and HasUserProfile edge creation. Added IDMHound entry under FreeIPA section describing user, group, domain, and computer collection with HBAC and sudoer relationship mapping.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Possibly related issues

• OpenGraph Library: ProfileHound #147: Addresses the ProfileHound OpenGraph library entry addition to the documentation.

Possibly related PRs

• Add PingOneHound project to OpenGraph library #80: Modifies the same OpenGraph library documentation file to add new project entries.
• NetworkHound #70: Adds new OpenGraph project entries to the same library documentation.
• Add gopengraph to the Library #87: Updates OpenGraph library entries in the same documentation file.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

• StephenHinck
• Scoubi

Poem

🐰 A Hound finds profiles, another finds LDAP's call,
Two tools join the library, expanding knowledge for all!
ProfileHound searches where users have trod,
IDMHound gathers what FreeIPA's trod. ✨

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Out of Scope Changes check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR adds ProfileHound in addition to the linked issue #140's IDMHound requirement; ProfileHound is mentioned as closing issue #147 but that issue details are not provided.	Verify that ProfileHound addition aligns with issue #147 requirements to confirm all changes are within scope.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main changes: adding two new OpenGraph library entries (IDMHound and ProfileHound).
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The changes implement the IDMHound entry requirements from issue #140 with correct technology, functionality, author, and repository details.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3dce7e4 and 1a56be2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/opengraph/library.mdx

🔇 Additional comments (2)

docs/opengraph/library.mdx (2)

88-101: ProfileHound entry is well-structured and properly formatted.

The entry follows the established format and provides a clear description of the tool's functionality. The repository URL is accessible, the author information is complete with LinkedIn profile link, and the placement under the Active Directory accordion is appropriate for this post-escalation tool.

---

193-206: IDMHound entry is present and properly formatted.

The FreeIPA accordion section with IDMHound entry at lines 193-206 exists and is correctly structured with author information (Samuel Bovy), repository URL (https://github.com/lvruibr/idmhound), and description. The repository is accessible.

However, the review's claim about matching "issue #140 requirements" cannot be verified—no reference to issue #140 can be found within the repository. The specific terminology comparison ("sudoer rights" vs "sudo rights") also cannot be validated without access to the actual issue description.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[StephenHinck]

SHIP IT