Skip to content

Conversation

@AlexanderLitus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 81.08%

Merging #122 into master will increase coverage by +1.65% as of fbf60ef

@@            master    #122   diff @@
======================================
  Files           79      93    +14
  Stmts         2388    2734   +346
  Branches       271     325    +54
  Methods                          
======================================
+ Hit           1897    2217   +320
- Partial         83      92     +9
- Missed         408     425    +17

Review entire Coverage Diff as of fbf60ef

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

string msg = 2;
}

// TODO:2016-03-14:alexander.litus: is this option really needed? Why not use min/max instead?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's address this and other TODOs.

message ConstraintViolation {
// An interpolated error message for this constraint violation.
// An error message for this constraint violation
// (or a template which contains `%s` format specifiers).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it contains format placeholders, then it's not a message, it's message_format, or, better, format.

@AlexanderLitus
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexander-yevsyukov, PTAL. It is remained to implement the Gradle plugin for generating entities.props. And the build will pass then.
Also, should I write to Google support to obtain globally unique field number(s) for our options now? We need several numbers.

@AlexanderLitus
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexander-yevsyukov, PTAL. I've requested globally unique field numbers for our custom options, it is remained only to add them.

@alexander-yevsyukov
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@AlexanderLitus AlexanderLitus merged commit 13142ac into master Apr 7, 2016
@AlexanderLitus AlexanderLitus deleted the proto-messages-validation branch April 7, 2016 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants