Skip to content

Conversation

@greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

eslint-plugin-mocha just published its new version 4.3.0.

State Update 🚀
Dependency eslint-plugin-mocha
New version 4.3.0
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint-plugin-mocha.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 11 commits .

  • 3cafff5 4.3.0
  • 2957ca8 Merge pull request #86 from lo1tuma/greenkeeper-mocha-3.0.0
  • 55ecd79 Merge pull request #85 from jfmengels/no-sibling-hooks
  • 316adb6 chore(package): update mocha to version 3.0.0
  • f9b6bbf Prevent potential error with logical operator mixing
  • dd875dd Add support for describe aliases and modifiers
  • 78976b8 Doc nit
  • ef3904a Split test by lines
  • e26fd48 Add rule no-sibling-hooks (fixes #82)
  • 2c3ee65 Merge pull request #84 from jfmengels/issue-39
  • 6366a3a Add rule no-hooks (fixes #39)

See the full diff.

@dbrockman dbrockman merged commit 525349e into master Aug 2, 2016
@dbrockman dbrockman deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-mocha-4.3.0 branch August 2, 2016 06:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants