Skip to content

Conversation

@lukaskollmer
Copy link
Member

small fixes

⚙️ Release Notes

  • improved diagnostic messages for incorrect usage of the macro
  • proper error handling when creating the pthread key

Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By creating and submitting this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

@lukaskollmer lukaskollmer self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
@lukaskollmer lukaskollmer added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 4, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 71.88%. Comparing base (2d45568) to head (0c683a8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
Sources/ThreadLocal/ThreadLocal.swift 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #3      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.34%   71.88%   -1.45%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines          30       32       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits           22       23       +1     
- Misses          8        9       +1     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
Sources/ThreadLocalMacros/ThreadLocalMacro.swift 87.50% <ø> (ø)
Sources/ThreadLocalMacros/ThreadLocalMacros.swift 0.00% <ø> (ø)
Sources/ThreadLocal/ThreadLocal.swift 73.69% <50.00%> (-2.78%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2d45568...0c683a8. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@PSchmiedmayer PSchmiedmayer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @lukaskollmer 🚀

@lukaskollmer lukaskollmer marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2025 13:24
@lukaskollmer lukaskollmer merged commit 2600d76 into main Dec 14, 2025
13 of 15 checks passed
@lukaskollmer lukaskollmer deleted the lukas/small-improvements branch December 14, 2025 13:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants