Skip to content

Fix WHITEPAPER_AUDIT.md notation, clarifications, and terminology #34

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Steake merged 2 commits into from
Dec 6, 2025
Merged

Fix WHITEPAPER_AUDIT.md notation, clarifications, and terminology #34

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
a7a8ea4
Initial plan
Copilot Dec 6, 2025
85b88db
Apply reviewer suggestions: fix notation, add clarifications, standar…
Copilot Dec 6, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
24 changes: 12 additions & 12 deletions docs/WHITEPAPER_AUDIT.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -435,10 +435,10 @@ flowchart TD
R --> OPINION
S --> OPINION
OPINION[Opinion Calculation]
OPINION --> |R = r_m + s_m| TOTAL
TOTAL --> |belief = r_m / R+K| B
TOTAL --> |disbelief = s_m / R+K| D
TOTAL --> |uncertainty = K / R+K| U
OPINION --> |W = r_m + s_m| TOTAL
TOTAL --> |belief = r_m / (W+K)| B
TOTAL --> |disbelief = s_m / (W+K)| D
TOTAL --> |uncertainty = K / (W+K)| U
B[Belief b]
D[Disbelief d]
U[Uncertainty u]
Expand All @@ -448,8 +448,8 @@ flowchart TD
end

subgraph Decay per Epoch
R --> |×0.99| R
S --> |×0.999| S
r_m --> |×0.99| r_m
s_m --> |×0.999| s_m
end

subgraph Eligibility Check
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ graph LR
| WP Requirement | Implementation | Status | Notes |
|----------------|----------------|--------|-------|
| Battle circuit structure | `BattleCircuit` | ✅ | |
| Winner ID validation | Constraint: `w*(w-1)*(w-2)=0` | ✅ | |
| Winner ID validation | Constraint: `w*(w-1)*(w-2)=0` | ✅ | 0 = Player A wins, 1 = Player B wins, 2 = Draw |
| CA evolution verification | TODO | ⚠️ | Complex constraint programming needed |
| State circuit structure | `StateCircuit` | ✅ | |
| Non-equality constraint | `diff * inv = 1` | ✅ | Fixed in RC1 |
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ flowchart TD
BASE --> |EIP-1559 style| ADJUST[Adjust per Block]

CONTRACT[Private Contract]
CONTRACT --> |×2 multiplier| PRIVACY[Privacy Premium]
CONTRACT --> |×2 multiplier| PRIVACY[Privacy Premium: Ring Signature Privacy]
end

subgraph "Supply Schedule"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -908,14 +908,14 @@ graph LR

**Risk Level:** Low - core functionality present, advanced features deferred.

### 4. Recursive SNARK Aggregation
### 4. Recursive zkSNARK Aggregation

**WP Spec:** Proof aggregation via recursive SNARKs for scalability.
**WP Spec:** Proof aggregation via recursive zkSNARKs for scalability.

**Implementation:** Individual Groth16 proofs per battle.

**Rationale:**
- Recursive SNARKs require significant R&D
- Recursive zkSNARKs require significant R&D
- Current approach functional for RC1 throughput
- Planned for v1.0+

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ graph LR

### Priority 2: v1.0 Enhancements

1. **Recursive SNARK Aggregation**
1. **Recursive zkSNARK Aggregation**
- Migrate to Plonk or STARK
- Implement recursive verification
- Reduce block verification time
Expand Down