e2e test tweaks

[Crabcyborg]

It looks like a test is failing.

This update aims to make it a bit more robust.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced reliability of form entry deletion tests with improved interaction handling and verification logic.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bf40002b-12ee-4343-be6b-8f18e77b5d3a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 151fa4e and de5420a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/cypress/e2e/Entries/deleteEntries.cy.js

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR updates a Cypress e2e test for deleting submitted form entries. The checkbox selection now targets the label element directly instead of the container, and the table verification logic is made more resilient by querying based on the "Checkboxes" header cell rather than a fixed column index.

Changes

Delete Entry Test Improvements

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Checkbox interaction and table verification selectors tests/cypress/e2e/Entries/deleteEntries.cy.js	Checkbox interaction changed to click the label element within the checkbox wrapper. Table verification for "Checkboxes" column updated to locate the column by header and query its sibling cell instead of using a fixed :nth-child(3) selector.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

---

🐰 A test clicks a label true,

No hardcoded paths to construe,

Selectors now dance,

More resilient—no chance,

Of DOM chaos breaking the view! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title "e2e test tweaks" is vague and generic, using non-specific language that doesn't clearly convey what the actual changes are beyond mentioning e2e tests.	Consider a more specific title that describes the actual test fix, such as 'Fix checkbox interaction in deleteEntries e2e test' or 'Improve resilience of table column verification in deleteEntries test'.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch e2e_test_tweaks

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[deepsource-io]

DeepSource Code Review

We reviewed changes in 151fa4e...de5420a on this pull request. Below is the summary for the review, and you can see the individual issues we found as inline review comments.

See full review on DeepSource ↗

PR Report Card

Overall Grade

Security   Reliability   Complexity   Hygiene

Code Review Summary

Analyzer	Status	Updated (UTC)	Details
PHP		Jun 8, 2026 12:40p.m.	Review ↗
JavaScript		Jun 8, 2026 12:40p.m.	Review ↗

---

Important

AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.