Skip to content

fixed dates in event entry #82

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
bebatut merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2022
Merged

fixed dates in event entry #82

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
af258a3
Update 2019-10-27-sequencing_flongle_trial.md
teresa-m Aug 17, 2022
babecd6
Merge pull request #1 from teresa-m/update-sequecing-test-event
teresa-m Aug 17, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions _events/2019-10-27-sequencing_flongle_trial.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,6 +19,6 @@ photos:
url: https://www.flickr.com/photos/134305289@N03/shares/AmKS19
---

On the 27nd of February we tested the new flongle nanopore flowcell to see if we can substitute the more accurate but also more expensive nanopore flowcell with the flongle. The second aim of our internal workshop was to test the new sequencing protocol and see if members of the group, who did not perform the DNA sequencing until now could follow the protocol easily.
On the 27nd of October we tested the new flongle nanopore flowcell to see if we can substitute the more accurate but also more expensive nanopore flowcell with the flongle, to sequence the DNA within our workshop. The second aim of our internal workshop was to test the updated sequencing instruction protocol and see if members of the group, who did not perform the DNA sequencing until now could follow the protocol easily.
We could identify some weak spots in the protocol, which could have let to the low amount of sequenced read outcome on this day.
To rule out any issues of the sequenced probe or the newly used flongle we repeated the sequencing with more experienced people. Both experiences helped us to impove not only the protocol but also identify operational issues which a person without lab experience could face.
To rule out any issues of the sequenced probe or the newly used flongle we repeated the sequencing with more experienced people on the 26nd of November. Both experiences helped us to impove not only the protocol but also identify operational issues which a person without lab experience could face.