V2.0 Update - Discussions #26
Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
|
@StudioNirin
|
|
Good Morning Everyone, I need a small clarification on new added things with update 2.0 Now im also getting a unraid_mover_exclusions.txt But when running the script - both are changed. Which one is now the right one to get checked by the mover? |
|
First: Thanks for Update 2.0 - it works really good and I really like the new additions like the configurable retention time e.g. I have a Feature Request @StudioNirin / @Brandon-Haney But with this new log (mode: summary) I dont know anything. I totally get it, that you possibly wanted to reduce the amount of information in the logfile as it was overwhelming. For me it would be totally fine if you add to the current logfile:
|
|
So I made some changes with my setup. I now have 2 pools named The In this case, am I right to assume that I do not have to put |

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@Brandon-Haney
Ok I've merged the latest PR into the test branch for V2.0, everything seemed to be working correctly and I couldn't find any issues. Figured I'd start a new thread for this now, maybe with a shortlist of things to test and check before V2.0 gets a proper release.
We have a lot of created files, both new and old, and I'm not 100% sure which ones are still necessary. I've removed most of them just because I am going to test with a moderately fresh install.
For instance, is the 'watched_cache' and 'watchlist_cache' files still needed? We seem to now also have 'timestamps' and 'watchlist_tracker' files.
There's also a 'plexcache_user_tokens' file, though I'm not sure why this needed to be split off from the 'plexcache_settings' file which already had fields for user tags and tokens. Unless this needs to be separate for some reason, I think maybe it would be better merging it.
Basically my goal is to streamline things as much as possible. Makes it easier for people migrating etc. Your new setup file already handles migrations tidily and helps users through it.
Edit:
From what I can tell, watchlist_tracker has replaced watchlist_cache, so migrating users can delete that file. The new tracker file is also used to store the timestamps of the watchlist files for retention purposes.
plexcache_timestamps is used for.... onDeck and whatever logic is used to mark something as 'pre-existing' (I assume it's things already on cache while also being onDeck or on Watchlists(?), but I'm not sure why they're not just being marked as onDeck or Watchlist instead of pre-existing.
In fact that file seems to just be onDeck files and not watchlists, so I'm not sure why pre-existing mattered.
Edit: Ahh interesting, I didn't notice that the RSS feed has 'author' coding, I assume that tallies up with the user. When I figured out the RSS setup as a workaround for remote users I never found any documentation about that actually being an identifiable tag, everyone seemed to think the RSS feed was essentially 'anonymous'. Very nice!
All reactions