Skip to content

[WIP] Establish project scaffolding and documentation for Spec2Flow#1

Merged
haochencheng merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
copilot/initial-project-scaffolding
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

[WIP] Establish project scaffolding and documentation for Spec2Flow#1
haochencheng merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
copilot/initial-project-scaffolding

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Mar 23, 2026

  • Write comprehensive README.md for Spec2Flow
  • Create docs/mvp-features.md — MVP feature list
  • Create docs/repository-structure.md — proposed directory layout
  • Create docs/development-plan.md — first-version dev plan
  • Create docs/architecture.md — agent / execution / CI layer design
  • Add starter placeholder files (src/, tests/, scripts/, etc.)
  • Add .gitignore appropriate for a Node/Python/Playwright project
  • Add CONTRIBUTING.md for open-source contributor friendliness
  • Run code review and CodeQL checks
Original prompt

Create the initial open-source project foundation for cliff-personal/Spec2Flow based on the agreed product direction from the conversation.

Project intent:

  • Spec2Flow is an open-source AI workflow framework that turns product specs and source code into implementation, testing, automation, and bug reporting.
  • The user wants to start with a practical MVP focused on: reading product/design docs and code, generating test plans and test cases, starting services, running browser-based automated tests, and drafting/submitting bug reports.
  • The user is a solo developer and wants a pragmatic first version that prioritizes a direct Copilot-like agent + Playwright + CI approach, with room to evolve later into a richer orchestration framework.

Please create an initial PR that establishes the project scaffolding and documentation needed to begin development. Include at minimum:

  1. A strong README homepage for Spec2Flow that explains:
    • What the project is
    • Why it exists
    • Core MVP capabilities
    • Suggested architecture (agent layer, execution layer, CI layer)
    • Roadmap / future direction
  2. An MVP feature list document.
  3. A proposed repository directory structure document.
  4. A first-version development plan document.
  5. If appropriate, include minimal starter files (for example README, docs folder structure, placeholders) that support these docs.

Constraints:

  • Keep the scope practical and lightweight for a solo maintainer.
  • Optimize for open-source clarity and contributor friendliness.
  • Do not over-engineer the initial implementation.
  • Preserve the product name exactly as Spec2Flow.

Please create a concise, useful initial PR that gives the repository a solid public starting point.

The following is the prior conversation context from the user's chat exploration (may be truncated):

User: github 趋势和一周热榜 如何查看

Assistant: 要看 GitHub 的「趋势」和「一周热榜」,主要有两种官方入口:Trending(趋势)Explore(探索/发现)

1) GitHub 趋势(Trending)怎么查看

GitHub 有专门的 Trending 页面,可以按语言、时间范围筛选(含 daily / weekly / monthly)。

  • 仓库趋势(Repositories Trending)
    • 入口:在 GitHub 网站上进入 Trending
    • 常用筛选:Language 选语言、Date rangeWeekly(一周)
  • 开发者趋势(Developers Trending)
    • 同一页面里也可切到 Developers,看某语言/某周期里活跃的开发者

你可以这样用:

  1. 打开 Trending 页面
  2. 选择语言(比如 Python / TypeScript / Go 等)
  3. 将时间范围切换为 Weekly
  4. 就是你要的「一周热榜/周趋势」

2) “一周热榜”在 GitHub 上对应什么

在 GitHub 官方界面里,“一周热榜”通常对应两种东西:

  • Trending 的 Weekly:按最近一周的热度(常见是星标增长)排序
  • Explore/Discover:偏“推荐/发现”,不一定严格等于按一周增量排序,但也能看到热门项目

Explore 入口一般在 GitHub 顶部导航的 Explore,里面有 Topics、Collections、推荐项目等。

3) 快速建议(按你的目的选)

  • 你要“这周哪些仓库突然火了”:用 Trending → Weekly
  • 你要“按语言找这周热门”:用 Trending → Language + Weekly
  • 你要“官方编辑推荐/专题合集”:用 Explore

如果你告诉我你更关心的是 某个语言(比如 Rust/Java/AI)还是 某个领域(比如 LLM、前端、DevOps),我可以给你最省事的筛选方式(以及如何直接筛到“最近一周新增 Star 最多”的那类项目)。

User: GitHub 趋势(Trending)怎么查看 url 是什么 Repositories Trending

Assistant: Repositories Trending 的 URL 是:

https://github.com/trending

这是 GitHub 官方的趋势页入口。GitHub Docs 也明确提到可以通过 Trending 页面浏览当日热门仓库;Explore 页面则是 https://github.com/explore。(docs.github.com)

如果你想看 一周热榜(Weekly),就在 Trending 页面里把时间范围切到 Weekly。GitHub 官方文档虽然没有在我查到的这几篇文档里直接列出完整的 weekly 参数格式,但官方站点的趋势页入口就是上面这个地址。(docs.github.com)

你可以直接这样理解:

  • Repositories Trendinghttps://github.com/trending
  • Explorehttps://github.com/explore (docs.github.com)

如果你愿意,我下一条可以直接给你整理成:

  1. 全部趋势页 URL
  2. 按语言查看的 URL 写法
  3. 周榜 / 月榜的常用访问方式

User: 我想让openclaw 根据代码产品设计文档和 代码 设计测试方案,和测试case。然后根据测试case 自动测试 启动服务 在浏览器中模拟点击 测试功能 提交bug 我该怎么做呢

Assistant: 可以,但要拆成两层来做

  1. 让 OpenClaw/代理根据 PRD + 代码,产出测试方案和测试用例
  2. 再让它按测试用例执行自动化测试:启动服务、浏览器点击、记录结果、提交 bug

OpenClaw 官方文档明确支持一个受控浏览器,代理可以打开页面、读取页面、点击和输入;推荐流程是先 status/start,再 snapshot,然后 act(click/type/press),必要时再截图验证。它也支持独立的 openclaw 浏览器配置文件,适合做自动化验证。(docs.openclaw.ai)


你想要的完整目标,其实可以这样落地

A. 先让它“读文档 + 读代码”,生成测试设计

你可以把这些材料给 OpenClaw:

  • 产品设计文档 / PRD
  • 技术设计文档
  • 代码仓库
  • 启动方式
  • 测试环境地址
  • Bug 提交目标(GitHub Issues / Jira / 禅道等)

然后给它一个明确任务提示词,例如:

请基于以下内容为这个项目设计完整测试方案:

输入材料:
1. 产品设计文档:<放文档路径或内容>
2. 技术设计文档:<放文档路径或内容>
3. 代码仓库:<仓库路径>
4. 启动命令:<如 npm install && npm run dev>
5. 测试环境要求:<如本地 3000 端口>

请输出:
1. 测试范围
2. 功能测试点矩阵
3. 冒烟测试清单
4. 回归测试清单
5. 边界/异常测试清单
6. 每条测试用例:
   - 用例ID
   - 模块
   - 前置条件
   - 测试步骤
   - 预期结果
   - 优先级
   - 是否适合自动化
7. 自动化执行建议:
   - 哪些适合浏览器自动化
   - 哪些需要接口测试
   - 哪些需要人工验证

这样它先输出的是测试设计结果,不是直接乱点页面。


B. 再让它“根据测试 case 执行自动化测试”

OpenClaw 的浏览器能力适合做这类事情:

  • 启动浏览器
  • 打开测试地址
  • 读取页面结构
  • 点击按钮、输入表单、切换 tab
  • 截图保存证据

OpenClaw 文档说明它的受控浏览器可执行打开、点击、输入、截图、快照等动作;登录类站点建议你手动在 openclaw 浏览器里登录,不要把账号密码直接交给模型。([docs.openclaw.ai](http...

This pull request was created from Copilot chat.


💬 Send tasks to Copilot coding agent from Slack and Teams to turn conversations into code. Copilot posts an update in your thread when it's finished.

@haochencheng haochencheng marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2026 01:02
@haochencheng haochencheng merged commit b40098e into main Mar 23, 2026
1 check failed
Copilot AI requested a review from haochencheng March 23, 2026 01:03
Copilot stopped work on behalf of haochencheng due to an error March 23, 2026 01:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants