Replies: 1 comment
|
Supporting offline edits. sounds pretty nice |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
Current OpenMAIC provides online editing for PPT and narration scripts, but the online editor is low‑efficiency for formal course making. Hope to support offline editing + file import workflow, reuse offline‑polished materials to generate final courses.
Problem
The built‑in online editor is not suitable for heavy polishing: adjusting PPT layout, bulk modifying content, proofreading long narration scripts are cumbersome.
Enterprise trainers usually finish PPT/typesetting/review offline. Existing online‑only workflow forces manual copy‑paste, breaking content continuity and lowering productivity.
Proposed features
Two main workflows:
1. Import both PPT + narration script
Edit PPT and explanation script offline, import files into OpenMAIC. Continue to generate & assemble the final course based on imported content.
2. Import PPT only → regenerate narration script
User prepares polished PPT offline only. After import, system parses slide content and automatically generates matching explanation scripts, then produces the full course.
Keep original online editing function as‑is. Two modes coexist:
Quick draft: generate & edit online directly
Formal production: offline polish → import → AI post‑processing & course assembly
Use cases
Enterprise internal training: offline standard PPT style, import and auto‑generate teaching scripts.
Existing stock course assets: import legacy PPTs to quickly digitize courses.
Iterative polishing: offline revise content, re‑import for secondary AI generation.
Expected value
Fit real‑world enterprise course‑making habits
Reduce repetitive copy‑paste work
Reuse existing PPT assets, improve overall course creation efficiency
Rough implementation hints (for discussion)
Support import *.pptx; parse slide text, structure and hierarchy.
Provide generation strategy option: strictly follow imported content / allow reasonable expansion.
Preserve original online editing capability, no breaking change.
Alternatives considered
Manual copy content from offline files to online editor. It is error‑prone, inefficient and not viable for formal courses.
All reactions