Skip to content

fix(ci): bump CSHARP_CID after kit drift#36

Merged
TSavo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/ci-csharp-cid-bump
May 2, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): bump CSHARP_CID after kit drift#36
TSavo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/ci-csharp-cid-bump

Conversation

@TSavo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@TSavo TSavo commented May 2, 2026

Summary

`CSHARP_CID` was pinned at v1.2.0-era value. Recent kit work (binaryCid + targetProofCid + sourceContractCid + EvidenceTerm in PRs #14/#17/#18/#21) shifted what mint produces.

  • old: `45d7cdbd...415c`
  • new: `cec85197...c61e` (from CI run 25257912739)

Quick pin bump to unblock CI. Structural follow-up: extend letter-envelope refactor (PR #30) to TS and C# so this constant disappears.

Test plan

  • CI mint-csharp matches new pin; conformance gate green

CSHARP_CID was pinned at the v1.2.0-era value. Recent kit additions
(binaryCid + targetProofCid + sourceContractCid + EvidenceTerm landed
across kits in PRs #14/#17/#18/#21) shifted what the C# self-contracts
mint produces. CI captured the new value:

  old: 45d7cdbd...415c
  new: cec85197...c61e

Quick pin bump to unblock CI. Structural follow-up tracked: extend the
letter-envelope refactor (PR #30) to TS and C# so this constant
disappears entirely.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 2, 2026 17:48
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 2, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@TSavo has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 33 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a82ae098-2ff3-4d6e-93c7-89cf307303f9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1960974 and 013b433.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/ci-csharp-cid-bump

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 33 minutes and 25 seconds.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@TSavo TSavo merged commit c2fe48e into main May 2, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the pinned C# self-contracts bundle CID in the top-level Makefile to match the current output after recent protocol-additive kit changes (e.g., binaryCid, sourceContractCid, targetProofCid, EvidenceTerm), unblocking the CI conformance gate.

Changes:

  • Bump CSHARP_CID Makefile pin from the v1.2.0-era value to the newly minted CID.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants