Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughBoth Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit a02d4c4
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
🚀 Changeset Version PreviewNo changeset entries found. Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. |
size-limit report 📦
|
🎯 Changes
Widens the
test:eslintscript scope insvelte-queryandsvelte-query-persist-clientto include the./testsdirectory in addition to./src.Why
Both packages keep their test files under
tests/(notsrc/__tests__/), so the existing./src-only scope left those files uncovered by lint. This meant repo-wide ESLint rules weren't enforced on a large portion of test code — deadsvelte-ignoredirectives and other issues could accumulate unnoticed (the prerequisite PR #10531 cleaned up the existing instances).Files
packages/svelte-query/package.jsonpackages/svelte-query-persist-client/package.jsonsvelte-query-devtoolsis intentionally excluded — it has notests/directory.Verification
After the scope change, both packages lint cleanly (0 errors):
@tanstack/svelte-query: 0 errors (1 unrelated cspell warning on"refetched")@tanstack/svelte-query-persist-client: 0 errors, 0 warnings✅ Checklist
pnpm run test:pr.🚀 Release Impact
Summary by CodeRabbit