Docs Writer edit

[austin-schaefer]

I did a full edit of the Overview, Install, and all the Getting Started docs. For the other docs, I did a quick edit to improve capitalization consistency and add SEO descriptions but otherwise left the docs as-is.

Key changes:

• Removing capitalized terms
• Deleting repetitive text; in many instances, the LLM-written docs described the same feature multiple times or in mulitple places. I also removed many "summary"-type sections, which are less necessary if the docs are shorter.
• Remove sales-y language, especially where we're describing basic features like searching or saving.
• Simplifying structure with tables, bullet points, more consistent use of headers.
• Removing tips, notes, etc and integrating them into text.

I didn't have time to line-edit the docs in Core Concepts, Component Development, and References. But if you want to continue the edit, here is what you should look for:

• In many cases (pipelines persistence, overview, core concepts, first pipelines) I deleted large amounts of text. This is because LLMs tend to over-document: Too much detail, and lots of repetition.
• Watch for excess selling. LLMs often over-sell basic features. For example, I removed largea mounts of text explaining why undo/redo is valuable.
• Many docs also over-use tips, notes, and similar components. That makes the docs harder to scan because there are lots of visual elements competing for attention.

[camielvs]

Changes seem reasonable to me. Probably needs a passover from @maxy-shpfy as the original author of the content

[camielvs]

Switching review so Max can give explicit approval once he's reviewed.

It looks fine to me but want explicit review & approval from original authors before merging