Closes #2148 make the readme more appealing

[arolfes]

Only readme and images therefore no sonarcloud.

The diff of the readme is very large. You can find a rendered version here: https://github.com/arolfes/taskana/blob/2148-readme/README.md

---

Release Notes:

For the submitter:

• I updated the documentation and will supply links to the specific files
• I did not update the documentation
• I included a link to the SonarCloud branch analysis
• After integration of the PR, I added a description of changes on the current release notes
• I did not update the current release notes
• I put the ticket in review
• After integration of the pull request, I verified our bluemix test environment is not broken

Verified by the reviewer:

• Commit message format → TSK-XXX: Your commit message.
• Submitter's update to documentation is sufficient
• SonarCloud analysis meets our standards
• Update of the current release notes reflects changes
• PR fulfills the ticket
• Edge cases and unwanted side effects are tested
• Readability

[ryzheboka]

The README in this PR looks way better than before!

What is the rule for spelling entities? In this PR, some entities are spelled in caps (e. g. WORKBASKET). Some other entities are lowercase (e. g. workbasket) or uppercase (e. g. Workbasket).

How should TASKANA be spelled? As "Taskana" or "TASKANA"?

Are the spelling questions relevant, or are the incosistencies ok?

[ryzheboka]

Hi @arolfes , this PR looks really helpful to me. What needs to be done before integrating it?

[arolfes]

Hallo @ryzheboka ,

What needs to be done before integrating it?

The review is missing. Can you do a review? When you approve the changes, you can merge it or I will.

This image is not up to date because of two new TaskStatus "IN_REVIEW" and "READY_FOR_REVIEW". What do you think about the attached image instead?

By the way: I took your Image. :)

Best regards
Alex

[arolfes]

Hello @ryzheboka

How should TASKANA be spelled? As "Taskana" or "TASKANA"?

You are absolutely right, TASKANA should always be capitalised as a name in the documentation.

[arolfes]

Hello @ryzheboka

What is the rule for spelling entities? In this PR, some entities are spelled in caps (e. g. WORKBASKET). Some other entities are lowercase (e. g. workbasket) or uppercase (e. g. Workbasket).

Are the spelling questions relevant, or are the incosistencies ok?

Can you talk to Holger about it? I know in which case you write everything in capital letters and in which case in small letters.

If he thinks it's OK, then we leave it as it is and merge the thing.

I believe that anyone who stumbles across an inconsistency can fix it.

[ryzheboka]

Hi @arolfes ,

I asked @holgerhagen about uppercase vs lovercase. He said that we agreed to start every entity in uppercase. In the following example, "task" and "tasks" need to start in uppercase:
"Workbaskets indicate the responsibility for a task. The concepts of Workbaskets allow to differentiate between the permissions or the skills required to complete a tasks and the determination who should complete the tasks. This can diverge a lot in a larger organization."

Could you adjust this? Alternatively, I could add a commit to this branch that adjusts it.

[arolfes]

Could you adjust this? Alternatively, I could add a commit to this branch that adjusts it.

Hi @ryzheboka ,

It would be very helpful for me if you can do it. I trust you there. :) I gave you write permissions to this branch

I force pushed my branch. So you need do a git fetch && git pull first.

[ryzheboka]

The branch is rebased. I also adjusted the capitalization. @arolfes, could you check if everything looks ok? Then we can integrate this PR

[arolfes]

The branch is rebased. I also adjusted the capitalization. @arolfes, could you check if everything looks ok? Then we can integrate this PR

Good Morning,
for me everything looks ok.

I think we can merge it

[ryzheboka]

Hi @arolfes,
@gitgoodjhe noticed that the images look strange in dark mode. What do you think about adding white background to the "task lifecycle" and "workbaskets" images? I could change this :)

[arolfes]

Hello @ryzheboka ,

the images look strange in dark mode. What do you think about adding white background to the "task lifecycle" and "workbaskets" images?

I totally agree on this topic. the images look a bit strange :) White is fine. So it should work also in "normal" mode :)

I could change this :)
yes please. I'm not able to to such changes. Image manipulation is always a challenge for...