docs(agents): reframe agent-boundaries as forward ownership rules#108
Merged
Conversation
Removes backward-framing language ("easy to confuse", "commonly-confused",
"trap word", "seem to overlap") that implied an external observer found these
pairs problematic. Rewords to pure ownership — which agent owns which
responsibility, grounded in the contracts. Same substance, no conceptual signal
about what any downstream consumer gets wrong.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tightens the framing of
agent-boundaries.mdto pure ownership language.The boundaries themselves were already forward (ownership rules from the contracts), but the surrounding prose used backward framing — "easy to confuse", "commonly-confused pair", "trap word", "seem to overlap", "never confuse". That phrasing quietly implies something finds these pairs problematic, which is moat-adjacent. The automated
check:no-internal-refsguard cannot catch conceptual framing like this — caught on human review.Now reads as "which agent owns which responsibility," grounded in the public contracts. Same substance, zero signal about any downstream consumer.
Docs only; passes the CI guard.