Add M.O.M. governance/spec repository skeleton#104
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot. |
Summary of ChangesHello @TheAVCfiles, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request lays the groundwork for the M.O.M. (Memory. With. Governance.) project by creating a comprehensive, spec-first repository skeleton. The primary objective is to define a robust framework for building privacy-first memory systems that enforce consent, ensure data continuity, and contain potential risks. It provides all necessary foundational documents, including detailed system specifications, governance rules, threat models, and operational guidelines, to guide future development and ensure a secure, auditable, and ethically sound system from inception. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a comprehensive and well-structured repository skeleton for the M.O.M. project. The spec-first approach is evident in the detailed documentation covering system design, governance, security, and operational procedures. The overall quality of the documentation is high. My review includes a few suggestions to replace placeholder values and clarify some ambiguities within the specifications to ensure the core concepts are communicated clearly and to prevent potential misinterpretations during implementation.
|
|
||
| If you discover a vulnerability, report it privately to: | ||
|
|
||
| - Email: [YOUR-SECURITY@DOMAIN.COM] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The email address for reporting security vulnerabilities is a placeholder. This is a critical communication channel that must be active. Please replace [YOUR-SECURITY@DOMAIN.COM] with a real, monitored email address for private vulnerability disclosures.
|
|
||
| ## Reporting | ||
|
|
||
| Report incidents to: [YOUR-CONDUCT@DOMAIN.COM] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The contact email for reporting Code of Conduct incidents is currently a placeholder. To ensure reports can be received and properly handled, this should be replaced with a valid, monitored email address.
| Pricing: (set your number) | ||
| Availability: limited | ||
| Contact: (your email) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The commercial details for the governance sprint offer, such as pricing and contact information, are currently placeholders. These should be finalized before this document is used for any commercial purposes.
|
|
||
| - **MemNode™**: governed memory object (encrypted payload + consent + salience). | ||
| - **Corridors™**: typed relationships with traversal constraints. | ||
| - **Coda™**: append-only continuity log; no overwrite guarantees. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The definition of Coda™ is currently 'append-only continuity log; no overwrite guarantees.' This phrasing is ambiguous and could be misinterpreted to mean that Coda lacks guarantees against overwrites. Given that it's an append-only log, it should provide such guarantees. I suggest rephrasing for clarity to state that it prevents silent overwrites.
| - **Coda™**: append-only continuity log; no overwrite guarantees. | |
| - **Coda™**: append-only continuity log; guarantees no silent overwrites. |
|
|
||
| - `id`: stable unique identifier | ||
| - `owner_id`: user identity / tenant key | ||
| - `created_at`, `updated_at`: timestamps (updated_at may change only via append operations) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description for the updated_at field in MemNode says it 'may change only via append operations,' which is ambiguous in the context of an append-only system. It's unclear if MemNodes are mutable. To avoid misinterpretation during implementation, please clarify how updates are handled. For instance, you could specify that updates create a new MemNode and a corresponding Coda log event, making the original node immutable.
1 participant
Motivation
Description
README.md,CHANGELOG.md,LICENSE.md,SECURITY.md,CONTRIBUTING.md,CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, and.gitignore.mom/specs/includingSYSTEM_SPEC_v1.1.md,RULESET_NUDGE_CONSTITUTION_v1.0.md,THREAT_MODEL_v1.0.md, andGLOSSARY.md.mom/offer/,mom/glitchport/(taxonomy, scorecard, and incident write-ups), andmom/docs/(ROADMAP.md,FAQ.md).Testing
prettier --write) ran as part of the commit hooks and completed successfully.git commit) and the new files are staged in the repo.Codex Task