Skip to content

[pull] main from dolthub:main#39

Merged
pull[bot] merged 4 commits intoTheTechOddBug:mainfrom
dolthub:main
Jan 22, 2026
Merged

[pull] main from dolthub:main#39
pull[bot] merged 4 commits intoTheTechOddBug:mainfrom
dolthub:main

Conversation

@pull
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pull pull bot commented Jan 22, 2026

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

codeaucafe and others added 4 commits January 12, 2026 20:38
Add adapter and test expectations for the new dolt_status_ignored
system table from PR dolthub/dolt#10227. This table provides the same
information as dolt_status plus an additional ignored column
indicating whether unstaged new tables match a pattern in dolt_ignore.

Changes:
- Add DoltgresDoltStatusIgnoredTableAdapter in status_ignored.go
- Register DoltgresDoltStatusIgnoredTableAdapter in init.go
- Update pgcatalog_test.go with new dolt_status_ignore table to expected
tables
- Add new dolt_status_ignore table to sequences_test.go expected tables

Refs: dolthub/dolt#5862, dolthub/dolt#10227
Due to codeaucafe's contribution being on a fork updating the
doltgresql's go.mod to point to the updates in the dolt PR,
dolthub/dolt#10227 this requires a replace directive. This will at least
allow us to ensure this DoltgreSQL's PR can run CI.

Refs: dolthub/dolt#5862, dolthub/dolt#10227
Update pg_catalog test expectations to include new status_ignored system
table in the dolt schema.

Refs: dolthub/dolt#5862, dolthub/dolt#10227
…2-dolt-status-ignored-adapter

dolthub/dolt#10227: add dolt_status_ignored dolt system table
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2026
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Jan 22, 2026
@pull pull bot merged commit 581e3c7 into TheTechOddBug:main Jan 22, 2026
14 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants