Conversation
Walkthrough朕が検分した変更は、 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 分 追加で注意すべき箇所:
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
詩
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 RuboCop (1.81.6)android/Gemfile[convention] 4-4: Gems should be sorted in an alphabetical order within their section of the Gemfile. Gem (Bundler/OrderedGems) 🔇 Additional comments (2)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
android/Gemfile (1)
3-4: 朕はここに不服を申し立てる。宝石の配列順序を正す必要がある。静的解析の指摘の通り、Gemfileの宝石は字句順序に従って配列されるべき也。現在の配列では
fastlaneが先に在れど、字句順序に従えばabbrevが先に在るべし。朕の統一の大業の如く、此の秩序をも統一すべきなり。また、
abbrev宝石が追加される理由を明かされたし。これはfastlane ~> 2.226の依存関係より生じたるか、それとも明確なる意思によるものか。朕が知るべき事なり。申し候うは、以下の如く配列を改めるべし:
-gem "fastlane", "~> 2.226" -gem "abbrev", "~> 0.1" +gem "abbrev", "~> 0.1" +gem "fastlane", "~> 2.226"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
android/Gemfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
android/Gemfile(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 RuboCop (1.81.6)
android/Gemfile
[convention] 4-4: Gems should be sorted in an alphabetical order within their section of the Gemfile. Gem abbrev should appear before fastlane.
(Bundler/OrderedGems)
Summary by CodeRabbit
リリースノート