BOTでも問答無用にCodeRabbitがレヴューを始めるようにした

[TinyKitten]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Configured automated review workflows: automatic review triggering enabled.
  • Review workflow now enforces a "request changes" path for flagged items rather than auto-approving.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Adds a new .coderabbit.yml configuration file that enables automated review workflows and enables the request-changes workflow flag; no code or public API declarations changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CI / Review configuration /.coderabbit.yml	New YAML config introducing auto_review.enabled: true, auto_review.ignore_usernames: [], and reviews.request_changes_workflow: true to drive automated review behavior.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    autonumber
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant Git as Git/PR
    participant CR as CodeRabbit (config)
    participant Bot as Auto-review Bot

    Dev->>Git: Open or update Pull Request
    Note right of Git #f9f2d7: PR events (open/synchronize)
    Git->>CR: Read `/.coderabbit.yml`
    CR-->>Bot: auto_review.enabled = true\nignore_usernames = []\nrequest_changes_workflow = true
    Bot->>Git: Run automated review (may request changes per workflow)
    Note right of Bot #e6f7ff: Review complete (request-changes process possible)

Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Verify YAML syntax and schema keys (auto_review.*, reviews.request_changes_workflow).
• Confirm auto_review.ignore_usernames: [] and request-changes behavior match project policy.

Poem

🐇 A tiny YAML hops anew,
Tells the bot just what to do.
Reviews will run, requests may spring,
Quiet rules that make PRs sing. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title, when translated from Japanese, describes enabling CodeRabbit to start reviews unconditionally even for bot-created pull requests. The changeset modifies .coderabbit.yml to enable auto_review functionality and set auto_review.ignore_usernames to an empty list, which directly implements this intent by removing any username exclusions from automated reviews. The title is specific, clearly communicates the primary change, and accurately reflects the configuration modifications being made.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/crai-for-bots

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eccd4d8 and 58c13d2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (2)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: TinyKitten
Repo: TrainLCD/MobileApp PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T21:13:39.083Z
Learning: TinyKitten prefers concise code reviews for the TrainLCD/MobileApp repository. Keep review comments brief and to the point.

📚 Learning: 2025-08-11T21:13:39.083Z

Learnt from: TinyKitten
Repo: TrainLCD/MobileApp PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T21:13:39.083Z
Learning: TinyKitten prefers concise code reviews for the TrainLCD/MobileApp repository. Keep review comments brief and to the point.

Applied to files:

• .coderabbit.yml

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.coderabbit.yml (1)

1-6: Configuration looks good.

The setup correctly enables automatic reviews for all PRs (including bot-created ones, as intended) and enables the request-changes workflow. All properties conform to the CodeRabbit schema.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a17e2f0 and 0980edc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (1)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: TinyKitten
Repo: TrainLCD/MobileApp PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T21:13:39.083Z
Learning: TinyKitten prefers concise code reviews for the TrainLCD/MobileApp repository. Keep review comments brief and to the point.

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.coderabbit.yml (1)

11-12: The auto_approve property is present in the .coderabbit.yml file.

The review comment claims auto_approve is "not found in the CodeRabbit review schema," but the actual .coderabbit.yml configuration file in this repository actively uses this property under the review: section. While CodeRabbit documentation is not available in the repository, the property is demonstrably configured in the codebase and should not be flagged as invalid based solely on absence of documentation.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0980edc and eccd4d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (1)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: TinyKitten
Repo: TrainLCD/MobileApp PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T21:13:39.083Z
Learning: TinyKitten prefers concise code reviews for the TrainLCD/MobileApp repository. Keep review comments brief and to the point.