Skip to content

Task/#796 move code coverage to its own workflow#797

Merged
StuartFerguson merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
task/#796-move-code-coverage-to-its-own-workflow
Feb 27, 2026
Merged

Task/#796 move code coverage to its own workflow#797
StuartFerguson merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
task/#796-move-code-coverage-to-its-own-workflow

Conversation

@StuartFerguson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

closes #796

Removed code coverage steps and related comments from nightly build workflow.
@StuartFerguson StuartFerguson linked an issue Feb 27, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
Comment on lines +12 to +44
name: "Code Coverage"
env:
ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT: "Production"

runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2.3.4

- name: Restore Nuget Packages
run: dotnet restore EstateManagementUI.sln --source ${{ secrets.PUBLICFEEDURL }} --source ${{ secrets.PRIVATEFEED_URL }}

- name: Build Code
run: dotnet build EstateManagementUI.sln --configuration Release

- name: Run Unit Tests
run: |
echo "ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT are > ${ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT}"
dotnet test EstateManagementUI.BlazorServer.Tests/EstateManagementUI.BlazorServer.Tests.csproj --settings .runsettings /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:Exclude="[xunit*]*" /p:ExcludeByAttribute="Obsolete" /p:ExcludeByAttribute="GeneratedCodeAttribute" /p:ExcludeByAttribute="ExcludeFromCodeCoverageAttribute" /p:CoverletOutput="../lcov1.info" /maxcpucount:1 /p:CoverletOutputFormat="lcov"

- name: Install LCOV merger
run: npm install -g lcov-result-merger

- name: Merge LCOV reports
run: |
mkdir -p coverage
lcov-result-merger "*.info" > lcov.info

- name: Upload merged coverage to Codacy
uses: codacy/codacy-coverage-reporter-action@v1
with:
project-token: ${{ secrets.CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN }}
coverage-reports: ./lcov.info

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {contents: read}

Copilot Autofix

AI 2 months ago

To fix the problem, explicitly declare minimal GITHUB_TOKEN permissions for this workflow or job. Since the workflow only checks out code, builds, tests, and uploads coverage to Codacy (an external service), it only needs read access to repository contents. No repository writes (pushes, PR updates, etc.) are performed.

The best fix is to add a permissions block at the workflow root, right after name: Code Coverage, so it applies to all jobs (there is only codecoverage). Set contents: read as a minimal starting point in line with the CodeQL recommendation. No imports or additional methods are required; this is a pure YAML configuration change.

Concretely, in .github/workflows/codecoverage.yml, insert:

permissions:
  contents: read

between lines 1 and 3 (after the name line and before on:). This will ensure the GITHUB_TOKEN has only read access to repository contents during this workflow, without altering existing functionality.

Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/codecoverage.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/codecoverage.yml b/.github/workflows/codecoverage.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/codecoverage.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/codecoverage.yml
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 name: Code Coverage
 
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
 on:
   push:
     # branches to consider in the event; optional, defaults to all
EOF
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
name: Code Coverage

permissions:
contents: read

on:
push:
# branches to consider in the event; optional, defaults to all
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@StuartFerguson StuartFerguson merged commit 519c249 into main Feb 27, 2026
10 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot deleted the task/#796-move-code-coverage-to-its-own-workflow branch April 29, 2026 01:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move Code Coverage to its own workflow

2 participants