On Nicks entries I suggest to go with
- ELIGIBILITY: If we added a new specialisation of BOOKING ARRANGEMENTs (e.g. BOOKING ELIGIBILITY RESTRICTION
- COMPETITIVE RESTRICTIONS: I would prefer to use i here, as then we don't have to wait for CoRoM, which is not in the current scope of either 1.3 or 2.0. We can revisit it later. We model it as an extension to booking arrangement and we need to allow for booking arrangement on ServiceJourney, Connection and ServiceeJourneyInterchange besides Line.
On Nicks entries I suggest to go with